INTRODUCTION: Humoral immune responses play a pivotal role in naturally acquired immunity to malaria. Understanding which humoral responses are impaired among individuals at higher risk for malaria may improve our understanding of malaria immune control and contribute to vaccine development. METHODS: We compared humoral responses with 483 Plasmodium falciparum antigens between adults in, Kisumu (high, year-long malaria transmission leading to partial immunity), and adults in Kisii (low, seasonal malaria transmission). Then within each site, we compared malaria-specific humoral responses between those at higher risk for malaria (CD4(+) ≤500) and those at lower risk for malaria (CD4(+) >500). A protein microarray chip containing 483 P. falciparum antigens and 71 HIV antigens was used. Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments were made to control for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Fifty-seven antigens including CSP, MSP1, LSA1 and AMA1 were identified as significantly more reactive in Kisumu than in Kisii. Ten of these antigens had been identified as protective in an earlier study. CD4(+) T-cell count did not significantly impact humoral responses. CONCLUSION: Protein microarrays are a useful method to screen multiple humoral responses simultaneously. This study provides useful clues for potential vaccine candidates. Modest decreases in CD4 counts may not significantly impact malaria-specific humoral immunity.
INTRODUCTION: Humoral immune responses play a pivotal role in naturally acquired immunity to malaria. Understanding which humoral responses are impaired among individuals at higher risk for malaria may improve our understanding of malaria immune control and contribute to vaccine development. METHODS: We compared humoral responses with 483 Plasmodium falciparum antigens between adults in, Kisumu (high, year-long malaria transmission leading to partial immunity), and adults in Kisii (low, seasonal malaria transmission). Then within each site, we compared malaria-specific humoral responses between those at higher risk for malaria (CD4(+) ≤500) and those at lower risk for malaria (CD4(+) >500). A protein microarray chip containing 483 P. falciparum antigens and 71 HIV antigens was used. Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments were made to control for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Fifty-seven antigens including CSP, MSP1, LSA1 and AMA1 were identified as significantly more reactive in Kisumu than in Kisii. Ten of these antigens had been identified as protective in an earlier study. CD4(+) T-cell count did not significantly impact humoral responses. CONCLUSION: Protein microarrays are a useful method to screen multiple humoral responses simultaneously. This study provides useful clues for potential vaccine candidates. Modest decreases in CD4 counts may not significantly impact malaria-specific humoral immunity.
Authors: Peter D Crompton; Matthew A Kayala; Boubacar Traore; Kassoum Kayentao; Aissata Ongoiba; Greta E Weiss; Douglas M Molina; Chad R Burk; Michael Waisberg; Algis Jasinskas; Xiaolin Tan; Safiatou Doumbo; Didier Doumtabe; Younoussou Kone; David L Narum; Xiaowu Liang; Ogobara K Doumbo; Louis H Miller; Denise L Doolan; Pierre Baldi; Philip L Felgner; Susan K Pierce Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Whitworth; D Morgan; M Quigley; A Smith; B Mayanja; H Eotu; N Omoding; M Okongo; S Malamba; A Ojwiya Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-09-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lichen Jing; D Huw Davies; Tiana M Chong; Sookhee Chun; Christopher L McClurkan; Jay Huang; Brian T Story; Douglas M Molina; Siddiqua Hirst; Philip L Felgner; David M Koelle Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Claire L Mackintosh; Zoe Christodoulou; Tabitha W Mwangi; Moses Kortok; Robert Pinches; Thomas N Williams; Kevin Marsh; Christopher I Newbold Journal: Malar J Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Anne E Frosch; Oludare A Odumade; Justin J Taylor; Kathleen Ireland; George Ayodo; Bartholomew Ondigo; David L Narum; John Vulule; Chandy C John Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Omid Taghavian; Aarti Jain; Chester J Joyner; Sunny Ketchum; Rie Nakajima; Algis Jasinskas; Li Liang; Rich Fong; Christopher King; Bryan Greenhouse; Maxwell Murphy; Jason Bailey; Mary R Galinski; John W Barnwell; Christopher V Plowe; D Huw Davies; Philip L Felgner Journal: Proteomics Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Arlene E Dent; Rie Nakajima; Li Liang; Elisabeth Baum; Ann M Moormann; Peter Odada Sumba; John Vulule; Denise Babineau; Arlo Randall; D Huw Davies; Philip L Felgner; James W Kazura Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Elisabeth Baum; Jetsumon Sattabongkot; Jeeraphat Sirichaisinthop; Kirakorn Kiattibutr; D Huw Davies; Aarti Jain; Eugenia Lo; Ming-Chieh Lee; Arlo Z Randall; Douglas M Molina; Xiaowu Liang; Liwang Cui; Philip L Felgner; Guiyun Yan Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 2.979