Literature DB >> 21956044

Utilizing pre-therapy clinical schema and initial CT changes to predict progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on VEGF-targeted therapy: a preliminary analysis.

Andrew D Smith1, Shetal N Shah, Brian I Rini, Michael L Lieber, Erick M Remer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because of varying treatment effectiveness with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the association of prognostic pre-therapy clinical schema, initial post-therapy computed tomography (CT) findings, and combination thereof in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated. A predictive biomarker that combines clinical risk factors and CT imaging features associated with initial response to therapy would be useful in stratifying patients into risk groups to guide therapy, in designing and interpreting results of clinical trials, in planning risk-directed therapy, and in patient counseling. Early identification of poor responders using an imaging biomarker may reduce drug-related toxicity and cost and allow for a therapeutic intervention before disease burden significantly advances.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, baseline data for 82 patients with metastatic RCC treated with sunitinib or sorafenib was obtained for risk stratification by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria and criteria by Heng et al. (J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5794-9), (described here as "VEGF prognostic factors criteria"). The initial post-therapy CT was evaluated by Response Assessment Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Choi criteria, and Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS (the reference standard) for each patient group and overall accuracy of each method and combined criteria were calculated.
RESULTS: The MSKCC model, VEGF prognostic factors criteria, RECIST, MASS criteria, MSKCC + MASS criteria, and VEGF prognostic factors + MASS criteria each demonstrated significant differences in PFS among patient groups (P < 0.005 for each, Log-rank test). Stratification of patient groups by Choi criteria was not statistically significant with respect to PFS (P = 0.101). MSKCC + MASS criteria yielded the highest overall accuracy for identifying PFS ≥ 1 year (77%) and for identifying PFS < 1 year (77%).
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of pre-therapy clinical risk factors and CT imaging response by MASS criteria more effectively predicted PFS in patients with metastatic RCC on VEGF-targeted therapy than any single method.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metastatic renal cell carcinoma; Predicting outcome; Response evaluation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21956044     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  12 in total

1.  10% Tumor diameter shrinkage on the first follow-up computed tomography predicts clinical outcome in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with angiogenesis inhibitors: a follow-up validation study.

Authors:  Katherine M Krajewski; Yoko Franchetti; Mizuki Nishino; André P Fay; Nikhil Ramaiya; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-22

2.  Imaging techniques as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul Nathan; Anup Vinayan
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  Metastatic melanoma: lactate dehydrogenase levels and CT imaging findings of tumor devascularization allow accurate prediction of survival in patients treated with bevacizumab.

Authors:  Mark R Gray; Sara Martin del Campo; Xu Zhang; Haowei Zhang; Frederico F Souza; William E Carson; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Alternative Response Criteria and Clinical Risk Factors for Assessing Tumor Response in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Are Receiving Salvage Therapy.

Authors:  Hyunseon C Kang; Shiva Gupta; Wei Wei; Lina Lu; Marc R Matrana; Nizar M Tannir; Haesun Choi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Prognostic potential of initial CT changes for progression-free survival in gefitinib-treated patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Wu; Hsian-He Hsu; Wei-Chou Chang; Ho-Jui Tung; Kai-Hsiung Ko; Yi-Chih Hsu; Tsai-Wang Huang; Ching-Liang Ho; Hung Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer: current progress, unresolved questions and future directions.

Authors:  Naveen S Vasudev; Andrew R Reynolds
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 9.596

7.  Vascularity of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma specimens.

Authors:  Saadia A Aziz; Joshua Sznol; Adebowale Adeniran; John W Colberg; Robert L Camp; Harriet M Kluger
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Diffusion-weighted and multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI as surrogate markers of response to neoadjuvant sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  N Bharwani; M E Miquel; T Powles; P Dilks; A Shawyer; A Sahdev; P D Wilson; S Chowdhury; D M Berney; A G Rockall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Contrast-Enhanced CT Density Predicts Response to Sunitinib Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Simon Matoori; Yeeliang Thian; Dow-Mu Koh; Aslam Sohaib; James Larkin; Lisa Pickering; Andreas Gutzeit
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  Imaging Advances in the Management of Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Katherine M Krajewski; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.