Literature DB >> 21955775

Who you know or what you know? Effect of examiner familiarity with residents on OSCE scores.

Lynfa Stroud1, Jodi Herold, George Tomlinson, Rodrigo B Cavalcanti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the goal of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to be objective, examiner biases may influence scores. Examiner familiarity with candidates is a potential bias that has not been well studied.
METHOD: To determine the effect of familiarity, OSCE scores for 158 internal medicine residents were analyzed by whether examiners were familiar with them, based on previous clinical encounters, and if previous impressions were positive or negative. A hierarchical multivariable analysis of variance was performed to control for resident, examiner, and level of training.
RESULTS: Across 480 interactions (50 examiners, 158 residents), multivariable analysis showed that positive familiarity was associated with a significant increase in ratings (+0.37 on a 5-point scale), comparable to the difference between first- and third/fourth-year residents.
CONCLUSIONS: Familiarity with candidates is a significant source of examiner bias in OSCE scores. Consideration should be paid to the influence of examiners' previous knowledge of examinees and attempts made to mitigate this bias.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21955775     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a729d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  11 in total

1.  Workplace-Based Assessment of Internal Medicine Resident Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Michael D Jain; George A Tomlinson; Danica Lam; Jessica Liu; Deepti Damaraju; Allan S Detsky; Luke A Devine
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

Review 2.  A review of the medical education literature for graduate medical education teachers.

Authors:  Kenneth A Locke; Carol K Bates; Reena Karani; Shobhina G Chheda
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-06

3.  Trust Me, I Know Them: Assessing Interpersonal Bias in Surgery Residency Interviews.

Authors:  Chelsea Towaij; Nada Gawad; Kameela Alibhai; Danielle Doan; Isabelle Raîche
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Feedback Credibility in a Formative Postgraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Effects of Examiner Type.

Authors:  Lynfa Stroud; Matthew Sibbald; Denyse Richardson; Heather McDonald-Blumer; Rodrigo B Cavalcanti
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-04

5.  Enhancing the defensibility of examiners' marks in high stake OSCEs.

Authors:  Boaz Shulruf; Arvin Damodaran; Phil Jones; Sean Kennedy; George Mangos; Anthony J O'Sullivan; Joel Rhee; Silas Taylor; Gary Velan; Peter Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.

Authors:  Lauren Chong; Silas Taylor; Matthew Haywood; Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Boaz Shulruf
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2017-12-27

7.  Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students.

Authors:  So Jung Yune; Sang Yeoup Lee; Sun Ju Im; Bee Sung Kam; Sun Yong Baek
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?

Authors:  Aileen Faherty; Tim Counihan; Thomas Kropmans; Yvonne Finn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia.

Authors:  Lauren Chong; Silas Taylor; Matthew Haywood; Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Boaz Shulruf
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2018-07-18

10.  Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty.

Authors:  Boaz Shulruf; Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Arvin Damodaran; Peter Harris; Sean Kennedy; Anthony O'Sullivan; Silas Taylor
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.