Literature DB >> 21955685

Cisgenic barley with improved phytase activity.

Inger B Holme1, Giuseppe Dionisio, Henrik Brinch-Pedersen, Toni Wendt, Claus K Madsen, Eva Vincze, Preben B Holm.   

Abstract

The cisgenesis concept implies that plants are transformed only with their own genetic materials or genetic materials from closely related species capable of sexual hybridization. Furthermore, foreign sequences such as selection genes and vector-backbone sequences should be absent. We used a barley phytase gene (HvPAPhy_a) expressed during grain filling to evaluate the cisgenesis concept in barley. The marker gene elimination method was used to obtain marker-free plant lines. Here, the gene of interest and the selection gene are flanked by their own T-DNA borders to allow unlinked integration of the two genes. We analysed the transformants for co-transformation efficiency, increased phytase activities in the grain, integration of the kanamycin resistance gene of the vector-backbone and segregation between the HvPAPhy_a insert and the hygromycin resistance gene. The frequencies of the four parameters imply that it should be possible to select 11 potentially cisgenic T(1) -lines out of the 72 T(0) -lines obtained, indicating that the generation of cisgenic barley is possible at reasonable frequencies with present methods. We selected two potential cisgenic lines with a single extra copy of the HvPAPhy_a insert for further analysis. Seeds from plants homozygous for the insert showed 2.6- and 2.8-fold increases in phytase activities and the activity levels were stable over the three generations analysed. In one of the selected lines, the flanking sequences from both the left and right T-DNA borders were analysed. These sequences confirmed the absence of truncated vector-backbone sequences linked to the borders. The described line should therefore be classified as cisgenic.
© 2011 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal © 2011 Society for Experimental Biology, Association of Applied Biologists and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21955685     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00660.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  26 in total

Review 1.  Genetically modified (GM) crops: milestones and new advances in crop improvement.

Authors:  Ayushi Kamthan; Abira Chaudhuri; Mohan Kamthan; Asis Datta
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Evaluation of the mature grain phytase candidate HvPAPhy_a gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using CRISPR/Cas9 and TALENs.

Authors:  Inger B Holme; Toni Wendt; Javier Gil-Humanes; Lise C Deleuran; Colby G Starker; Daniel F Voytas; Henrik Brinch-Pedersen
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  TAL effector nucleases induce mutations at a pre-selected location in the genome of primary barley transformants.

Authors:  Toni Wendt; Preben Bach Holm; Colby G Starker; Michelle Christian; Daniel F Voytas; Henrik Brinch-Pedersen; Inger Bæksted Holme
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  The barley HvNAC6 transcription factor affects ABA accumulation and promotes basal resistance against powdery mildew.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Chen; Venura Perera; Michael W Christiansen; Inger B Holme; Per L Gregersen; Murray R Grant; David B Collinge; Michael F Lyngkjær
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Precision breeding for RNAi suppression of a major 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase gene improves cell wall saccharification from field grown sugarcane.

Authors:  Je Hyeong Jung; Baskaran Kannan; Hugo Dermawan; Geoffrey W Moxley; Fredy Altpeter
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 6.  Is genetic engineering ever going to take off in forage, turf and bioenergy crop breeding?

Authors:  Zeng-Yu Wang; E Charles Brummer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 7.  Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Krishan Kumar; Geetika Gambhir; Abhishek Dass; Amit Kumar Tripathi; Alla Singh; Abhishek Kumar Jha; Pranjal Yadava; Mukesh Choudhary; Sujay Rakshit
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Cisgenic apple trees; development, characterization, and performance.

Authors:  Frans A Krens; Jan G Schaart; Aranka M van der Burgh; Iris E M Tinnenbroek-Capel; Remmelt Groenwold; Linda P Kodde; Giovanni A L Broggini; Cesare Gessler; Henk J Schouten
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Cisgenics - a sustainable approach for crop improvement.

Authors:  R S Telem; Shabir H Wani; N B Singh; R Nandini; R Sadhukhan; S Bhattacharya; N Mandal
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  High mature grain phytase activity in the Triticeae has evolved by duplication followed by neofunctionalization of the purple acid phosphatase phytase (PAPhy) gene.

Authors:  Claus Krogh Madsen; Giuseppe Dionisio; Inger Bæksted Holme; Preben Bach Holm; Henrik Brinch-Pedersen
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.