Literature DB >> 21955226

Environmental effects on the detection of adaptation.

S Magalhães1, E Blanchet, M Egas, I Olivieri.   

Abstract

Detecting adaptation involves comparing the performance of populations evolving in different environments. This detection may be confounded by effects due to the environment experienced by organisms prior to the test. We tested whether such confounding effects occur, using spider-mite selection lines on two novel hosts and one ancestral host, after 15 generations of selection. Mites were either sampled directly from the selection lines or subjected to a common juvenile or to a common maternal environment, mimicking the most frequent environmental manipulations. These environments strongly affected all life-history traits. Moreover, the detection of adaptation and correlated responses on the ancestral host was inconsistent among environments in almost 20% of the cases. Indeed, we did not detect responses unambiguously for any life-history trait. This inconsistency was due to differential environmental effects on lines from different selection regimes. Therefore, the detection of adaptation requires a careful control of these environmental effects.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21955226     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02388.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  8 in total

1.  Sexual selection drives the evolution of male wing interference patterns.

Authors:  M F Hawkes; E Duffy; R Joag; A Skeats; J Radwan; N Wedell; M D Sharma; D J Hosken; J Troscianko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Microbiome Heritability and Its Role in Adaptation of Hosts to Novel Resources.

Authors:  Karen Bisschop; Hylke H Kortenbosch; Timo J B van Eldijk; Cyrus A Mallon; Joana F Salles; Dries Bonte; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Genotype-specific interactions between parasitic arthropods.

Authors:  M Orsucci; M Navajas; S Fellous
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Effects of host plant on life-history traits in the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae.

Authors:  Cassandra Marinosci; Sara Magalhães; Emilie Macke; Maria Navajas; David Carbonell; Céline Devaux; Isabelle Olivieri
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Suppression of Plant Defenses by Herbivorous Mites Is Not Associated with Adaptation to Host Plants.

Authors:  Jéssica T Paulo; Diogo P Godinho; Anabela Silva; Cristina Branquinho; Sara Magalhães
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Transient local adaptation and source-sink dynamics in experimental populations experiencing spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Karen Bisschop; Frederik Mortier; Rampal S Etienne; Dries Bonte
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Density-dependent dispersal promotes female-biased sex allocation in viscous populations.

Authors:  Chedhawat Chokechaipaisarn; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.812

8.  Performance in a novel environment subject to ghost competition.

Authors:  Karen Bisschop; Frederik Mortier; Dries Bonte; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.