| Literature DB >> 26356681 |
Cassandra Marinosci1, Sara Magalhães2, Emilie Macke3, Maria Navajas4, David Carbonell5, Céline Devaux1, Isabelle Olivieri1.
Abstract
Studying antagonistic coevolution between host plants and herbivores is particularly relevant for polyphagous species that can experience a great diversity of host plants with a large range of defenses. Here, we performed experimental evolution with the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae to detect how mites can exploit host plants. We thus compared on a same host the performance of replicated populations from an ancestral one reared for hundreds of generations on cucumber plants that were shifted to either tomato or cucumber plants. We controlled for maternal effects by rearing females from all replicated populations on either tomato or cucumber leaves, crossing this factor with the host plant in a factorial design. About 24 generations after the host shift and for all individual mites, we measured the following fitness components on tomato leaf fragments: survival at all stages, acceptance of the host plant by juvenile and adult mites, longevity, and female fecundity. The host plant on which mite populations had evolved did not affect the performance of the mites, but only affected their sex ratio. Females that lived on tomato plants for circa 24 generations produced a higher proportion of daughters than did females that lived on cucumber plants. In contrast, maternal effects influenced juvenile survival, acceptance of the host plant by adult mites and female fecundity. Independently of the host plant species on which their population had evolved, females reared on the tomato maternal environment produced offspring that survived better on tomato as juveniles, but accepted less this host plant as adults and had a lower fecundity than did females reared on the cucumber maternal environment. We also found that temporal blocks affected mite dispersal and both female longevity and fecundity. Taken together, our results show that the host plant species can affect critical parameters of population dynamics, and most importantly that maternal and environmental conditions can facilitate colonization and exploitation of a novel host in the polyphagous T. urticae, by affecting dispersal behavior (host acceptance) and female fecundity.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; host shift; maternal effects; plant acceptance; plant–herbivore interactions
Year: 2015 PMID: 26356681 PMCID: PMC4559057 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Sample sizes at generation 24 for each life-history trait according to the selection regime (SRC and SRT for cucumber and tomato plants, respectively), the maternal environment (MEC and MET for cucumber and tomato leaves, respectively) and the block (B1 and B2)
| SRC | SRT | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEC | MET | MEC | MET | ||||||
| B1 | B2 | B1 | B2 | B1 | B2 | B1 | B2 | ||
| Egg mortality | 83 | 91 | 85 | 93 | 92 | 91 | 87 | 90 | 712 |
| Juvenile acceptance | 75 | 86 | 79 | 93 | 87 | 85 | 83 | 88 | 676 |
| Juvenile mortality | 70 | 83 | 75 | 86 | 86 | 83 | 79 | 83 | 645 |
| Developmental time, Sex ratio and Adult acceptance | 56 | 42 | 60 | 64 | 67 | 50 | 68 | 70 | 477 |
| Time spent as an adult in the testing environment | 56 | 42 | 57 | 64 | 66 | 50 | 66 | 70 | 471 |
| Fecundity | 44 | 34 | 47 | 44 | 56 | 40 | 62 | 60 | 387 |
Effects of the experimental design on sex ratio, egg mortality, juvenile acceptance, and juvenile mortality
| Effects | Sex ratio | Egg mortality | Juvenile acceptance | Juvenile mortality | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 | χ2 | χ2 | χ2 | |||||
| SR | 0.21 | 0.65 | 1.82 | 0.18 | 1.77 | 0.18 | ||
| ME | 0.03 | 0.87 | 2.50 | 0.11 | ||||
| SR x ME | 3.23 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.68 | 1.16 | 0.28 | 0.78 | 0.38 |
| B | 1.54 | 0.21 | 3.36 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.80 | ||
SR, selection regime; ME, maternal environment; B, block. χ2 and P-value are in bold when the P-value <0.05.
Figure 1Sex ratio (proportion of males) of individuals that reached maturity as a function of the selection regime (SRC and SRT for cucumber and tomato, respectively) and the maternal environment (MEC and MET for cucumber and tomato, respectively).
Effects of the experimental design on adult acceptance, developmental time, time spent as an adult in the testing environment, and fecundity
| Effects | Adult acceptance | Developmental time | Time spent as an adult in the testing environment | Fecundity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 | χ2 | χ2 | χ2 | |||||
| SR | 1.08 | 0.30 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 0.87 |
| ME | 0.50 | 0.48 | 1.62 | 0.20 | ||||
| SR × ME | 0.02 | 0.88 | 0.26 | 0.61 | 0.12 | 0.72 | 0.14 | 0.71 |
| B | 0.44 | 0.51 | 1.40 | 0.24 | ||||
| Sex | 0.01 | 0.91 | 1.46 | 0.23 | – | – | ||
| Adult acceptance status | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Female acceptance status | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
SR, selection regime; ME, maternal environment; B, block. The ‘–’ indicates that the variable was not tested. χ2 and P-value are in bold when the P-value <0.05.
Figure 2Proportion of dead juveniles in the testing environment as a function of the maternal environment (MEC and MET for cucumber and tomato, respectively) and the block (with white for B1 and black for B2); vertical lines correspond to four standard errors.
Figure 3Fecundity of females in the testing environment as a function of the maternal environment (MEC and MET for cucumber and tomato, respectively), the female acceptance status (with circles for not accepting females and triangles for accepting females), and the block (with white for B1 and black for B2). Vertical lines correspond to four standard errors.
Figure 4Proportion of live adults in the testing environment through days for blocks B1 (A) and B2 (B). The black lines hold for females, the gray lines for males, the solid lines for adults that accepted the testing environment, and the dotted lines for adults that did not.