Literature DB >> 21953031

Evaluation of the ESPLINE® Influenza A & B-N assay for the detection of influenza A and B in nasopharyngeal aspirates.

E De Witte1, H Goossens, M Ieven.   

Abstract

Several direct antigen tests for the detection of influenza often lack sensitivity compared to immunofluorescence (IF) on the specimens and viral culture (VC). We evaluated the performance of a rapid test, the ESPLINE® Influenza A & B-N assay. A total of 302 respiratory specimens were collected at the University Hospital of Antwerp. A first group of 60 samples taken during the H1N1 outbreak (2009-2010) and a second group of 242 samples stored during the seasonal influenza epidemics (2000-2009) were analyzed with the ESPLINE® test. A subset of samples were also evaluated with the BinaxNOW Influenza and the Clearview Exact Influenza. The results were compared to IF on the specimens, VC with IF, and the combination of both, which was considered as the gold standard. The ESPLINE® test's overall sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 97%, during the H1N1 season 80% and 93%, and for the detection of seasonal influenza 93% and 97%, respectively. In comparison to the BinaxNOW Influenza and the Clearview Exact Influenza, all tests demonstrated a similar specificity of 92.0-100% but a significantly different sensitivity of 44.4-86.0%, with the ESPLINE® test being significantly more sensitive. Due to its very good performance and simplicity, the ESPLINE® test facilitates urgent testing. The test seems less sensitive to detect H1N1 compared to seasonal influenza, although the difference is borderline not significant (p = 0.067).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21953031     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1372-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  11 in total

1.  Pandemic H1N1 and seasonal H3N2 influenza infection in the human population show different distributions of viral loads, which substantially affect the performance of rapid influenza tests.

Authors:  Ji-Rong Yang; Je Lo; Yu-Lin Ho; Ho-Sheng Wu; Ming-Tsan Liu
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.303

2.  Comparison of two rapid influenza A/B test kits with reference methods showing high specificity and sensitivity for influenza A infection.

Authors:  Susanne Booth; Cristina Baleriola; William D Rawlinson
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Preliminary evaluation of two rapid antigen assays for novel influenza A (H1N1) virus detection in clinical specimens.

Authors:  Nicolas Lévêque; Jean-François Coste; Fanny Renois; Véronique Brodard; Christophe De Champs; Laurent Andréoletti
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  [Comparison of four rapid diagnostic kits using immunochromatography to detect influenza B viruses].

Authors:  Michimaru Hara; Shinichi Takao; Shinji Fukuda; Yukie Shimazu; Masaru Kuwayama; Kazuo Miyazaki
Journal:  Kansenshogaku Zasshi       Date:  2005-10

5.  Performance of laboratory diagnostics for the detection of influenza A(H1N1)v virus as correlated with the time after symptom onset and viral load.

Authors:  Peter K C Cheng; Kitty K Y Wong; Gannon C Mak; Ann H Wong; Anita Y Y Ng; Salina Y K Chow; Ricky K H Lam; C S Lau; K C Ng; Wilina Lim
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Evaluation of three immunoassay kits for rapid detection of influenza virus A and B.

Authors:  Adriana Weinberg; Miranda L Walker
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-03

7.  Comparison of a rapid antigen test with nucleic acid testing during cocirculation of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 and seasonal influenza A/H3N2.

Authors:  Jen Kok; Christopher C Blyth; Hong Foo; Jason Patterson; Janette Taylor; Kenneth McPhie; V Mala Ratnamohan; Jonathan R Iredell; Dominic E Dwyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  [Evaluation of an immunochromatography test using enzyme immunoassay for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses].

Authors:  Keiko Mitamura; Masahiko Yamazaki; Masataka Ichikawa; Kazuhiro Kimura; Chiharu Kawakami; Hideaki Shimizu; Sumi Watanabe; Mitsunobu Imai; Masayoshi Shinjo; Yoshinao Takeuchi; Norio Sugaya
Journal:  Kansenshogaku Zasshi       Date:  2004-07

9.  Performance of six influenza rapid tests in detecting human influenza in clinical specimens.

Authors:  Aeron C Hurt; Robert Alexander; Jan Hibbert; Nicola Deed; Ian G Barr
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 10.  Currently used nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of viruses and atypicals in acute respiratory infections.

Authors:  Margareta Ieven
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.168

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Alere i Influenza A&B for rapid detection of influenza viruses A and B.

Authors:  Shuping Nie; Richard B Roth; Jeffrey Stiles; Albina Mikhlina; Xuedong Lu; Yi-Wei Tang; N Esther Babady
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Point-of-care diagnostics for respiratory viral infections.

Authors:  Kerri Basile; Jen Kok; Dominic E Dwyer
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  The Clinical Effect of Seasonal Flu Vaccination on Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Yusuke Yoshino; Yoshitaka Wakabayashi; Takatoshi Kitazawa
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  Identification of respiratory viruses with a novel point-of-care multianalyte antigen detection test in children with acute respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  Lauri Ivaska; Jussi Niemelä; Terho Heikkinen; Tytti Vuorinen; Ville Peltola
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.168

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.