Literature DB >> 21952583

Revisit of field cancerization in squamous cell carcinoma of upper aerodigestive tract: better risk assessment with epigenetic markers.

Yi-Chia Lee1, Hsiu-Po Wang, Cheng-Ping Wang, Jenq-Yuh Ko, Jang-Ming Lee, Han-Mo Chiu, Jaw-Town Lin, Satoshi Yamashita, Daiji Oka, Naoko Watanabe, Yasunori Matsuda, Toshikazu Ushijima, Ming-Shiang Wu.   

Abstract

We quantified field cancerization of squamous cell carcinoma in the upper aerodigestive tract with epigenetic markers and evaluated their performance for risk assessment. Methylation levels were analyzed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR of biopsied specimens from a training set of 255 patients and a validation set of 224 patients. We also measured traditional risk factors based on demographics, lifestyle, serology, genetic polymorphisms, and endoscopy. The methylation levels of four markers increased stepwise, with the lowest levels in normal esophageal mucosae from healthy subjects without carcinogen exposure, then normal mucosae from healthy subjects with carcinogen exposure, then normal mucosae from cancer patients, and the highest levels were in cancerous mucosae (P < 0.05). Cumulative exposure to alcohol increased methylation of homeobox A9 in normal mucosae (P < 0.01). Drinkers had higher methylation of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 and metallothionein 1M (P < 0.05), and users of betel quid had higher methylation of homeobox A9 (P = 0.01). Smokers had increased methylation of all four markers (P < 0.05). Traditional risk factors allowed us to discriminate between patients with and without cancers with 74% sensitivity (95% CI: 67%-81%), 74% specificity (66%-82%), and 80% area under the curve (67%-91%); epigenetic markers in normal esophageal mucosa had values of 74% (69%-79%), 75% (67%-83%), and 83% (79%-87%); and both together had values of 82% (76%-88%), 81% (74%-88%), and 91% (88%-94%). Epigenetic markers done well in the validation set with 80% area under the curve (73%-85%). We concluded that epigenetics could improve the accuracies of risk assessment. 2011 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21952583     DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  18 in total

1.  Association between macrocytosis and metachronous squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection in men with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chikatoshi Katada; Tetsuji Yokoyama; Tomonori Yano; Ichiro Oda; Yuichi Shimizu; Hisashi Doyama; Tomoyuki Koike; Kohei Takizawa; Motohiro Hirao; Hiroyuki Okada; Takako Yoshii; Yutaro Kubota; Takenori Yamanouchi; Takashi Tsuda; Tai Omori; Nozomu Kobayashi; Haruhisa Suzuki; Satoshi Tanabe; Keisuke Hori; Norisuke Nakayama; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Naomi Kakushima; Yasumasa Matsuo; Hideki Ishikawa; Akira Yokoyama; Manabu Muto
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.230

2.  Enriching the molecular definition of the airway "field of cancerization:" establishing new paradigms for the patient at risk for lung cancer.

Authors:  Brigitte N Gomperts; Tonya C Walser; Avrum Spira; Steven M Dubinett
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-12-11

3.  DNA methylation of PAX1 as a biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yung-Kai Huang; Bou-Yu Peng; Chia-Yo Wu; Chien-Tien Su; Hui-Chen Wang; Hung-Cheng Lai
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal tissues have differential impacts on cancer risk among tissues.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamashita; Takayoshi Kishino; Takamasa Takahashi; Taichi Shimazu; Hadrien Charvat; Yasuo Kakugawa; Takeshi Nakajima; Yi-Chia Lee; Naoko Iida; Masahiro Maeda; Naoko Hattori; Hideyuki Takeshima; Reiko Nagano; Ichiro Oda; Shoichiro Tsugane; Ming-Shiang Wu; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Characterization of DNA hypermethylation in two cases of peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Ryota Hama; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Kanako Shinada; Yosuke Yamada; Yuka Ogata; Yoshihito Yoshida; Tomohiro Tamura; Tetsuya Hiraishi; Ritsuko Oikawa; Jo Sakurai; Tadateru Maehata; Hirotaka Koizumi; Fumio Itoh
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-07-27

7.  Precancerous esophageal epithelia are associated with significantly increased scattering coefficients.

Authors:  Jing-Wei Su; Yang-Hsien Lin; Chun-Ping Chiang; Jang-Ming Lee; Chao-Mao Hsieh; Min-Shu Hsieh; Pei-Wen Yang; Chen-Ping Wang; Ping-Huei Tseng; Yi-Chia Lee; Kung-Bin Sung
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Evolutionary dynamics in pre-invasive neoplasia.

Authors:  Christopher Abbosh; Subramanian Venkatesan; Samuel M Janes; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2017-04

9.  Specific Smad2/3 Linker Phosphorylation Indicates Esophageal Non-neoplastic and Neoplastic Stem-Like Cells and Neoplastic Development.

Authors:  Shunsuke Horitani; Toshiro Fukui; Yuji Tanimura; Yasushi Matsumoto; Sachi Miyamoto; Toshihiro Tanaka; Takashi Tomiyama; Tsukasa Ikeura; Yugo Ando; Akiyoshi Nishio; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Epigenetic, genetic and environmental interactions in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from northeast India.

Authors:  Fazlur Rahman Talukdar; Sankar Kumar Ghosh; Ruhina Shirin Laskar; Rosy Mondal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.