BACKGROUND: Global positioning systems (GPS) have emerged as a research tool to better understand environmental influences on physical activity. This study examined the feasibility of using GPS in terms of perceived acceptability, barriers, and ease of use in a racially/ethnically diverse sample of lower socioeconomic position (SEP). METHODS: Data were from 2 pilot studies involving a total of 170 African American, Hispanic, and White urban adults with a mean (standard deviation) age of 47.8 (±13.1) years. Participants wore a GPS for up to 7 days. They answered questions about GPS acceptability, barriers (wear-related concerns), and ease of use before and after wearing the GPS. RESULTS: We found high ratings of GPS acceptability and ease of use and low levels of wear-related concerns, which were maintained after data collection. While most were comfortable with their movements being tracked, older participants (P < .05) and African Americans (P < .05) reported lower comfort levels. Participants who were younger, with higher education, and low incomes were more likely to indicate that the GPS made the study more interesting (P < .05). Participants described technical and wear-related problems, but few concerns related to safety, loss, or appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of GPS was feasible in this racially/ethnically diverse, lower SEP sample.
BACKGROUND: Global positioning systems (GPS) have emerged as a research tool to better understand environmental influences on physical activity. This study examined the feasibility of using GPS in terms of perceived acceptability, barriers, and ease of use in a racially/ethnically diverse sample of lower socioeconomic position (SEP). METHODS: Data were from 2 pilot studies involving a total of 170 African American, Hispanic, and White urban adults with a mean (standard deviation) age of 47.8 (±13.1) years. Participants wore a GPS for up to 7 days. They answered questions about GPS acceptability, barriers (wear-related concerns), and ease of use before and after wearing the GPS. RESULTS: We found high ratings of GPS acceptability and ease of use and low levels of wear-related concerns, which were maintained after data collection. While most were comfortable with their movements being tracked, older participants (P < .05) and African Americans (P < .05) reported lower comfort levels. Participants who were younger, with higher education, and low incomes were more likely to indicate that the GPS made the study more interesting (P < .05). Participants described technical and wear-related problems, but few concerns related to safety, loss, or appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of GPS was feasible in this racially/ethnically diverse, lower SEP sample.
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Barbara A Israel; Chris M Coombe; Causandra Gaines; Angela G Reyes; Zachary Rowe; Sharon L Sand; Larkin L Strong; Sheryl Weir Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2011-08-26
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Joellen Wilbur; Edward Wang; Judith McDevitt; April Oh; Richard Block; Sue McNeil; Nina Savar Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2008-07-31
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Srimathi Kannan; J Timothy Dvonch; Barbara A Israel; Alex Allen; Sherman A James; James S House; James Lepkowski Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Andrew P Jones; Emma G Coombes; Simon J Griffin; Esther Mf van Sluijs Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Stephen A Matthews; Angela Odoms-Young; JoEllen Wilbur; Lani Wegrzyn; Kevin Gibbs; Carol Braunschweig; Carmen Stokes Journal: Health Place Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Seann D Regan; Donna Shelley; Kristen Day; Ryan R Ruff; Maliyhah Al-Bayan; Brian Elbel Journal: Geospat Health Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.212
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Farzana Kapadia; Seann D Regan; William C Goedel; Michael D Levy; Staci C Barton; Samuel R Friedman; Perry N Halkitis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adam Loveday; Lauren B Sherar; James P Sanders; Paul W Sanderson; Dale W Esliger Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 5.428