Literature DB >> 21951738

The use of healing touch in integrative oncology.

Laura K Hart1, Mildred I Freel, Pam J Haylock, Susan K Lutgendorf.   

Abstract

The use of complementary therapies by patients with cancer has become increasingly prevalent; as a result, oncology nurses find themselves needing to understand those therapies and the evidence-based support for their use. This article describes the integrative use of the biofield therapy healing touch in conjunction with the chemoradiation received by patients with cervical cancer (stages IB1 to IVA) as reported in a 2010 research study. Findings indicated effects on the immune response and depression in healing touch recipients compared to patients receiving relaxation or standard care. Specifically, healing touch recipients demonstrated a minimal decrease in natural killer cell cytotoxicity over the course of treatment, whereas the cytotoxicity of patients receiving relaxation therapy and standard care declined sharply during radiation. Healing touch recipients also showed decreases in depressed mood compared to relaxation therapy and standard care recipients. The findings suggest that appropriate integration of complementary modalities into oncology care can enhance the impact of conventional care by putting patients in the best condition to use their innate healing resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21951738      PMCID: PMC3907587          DOI: 10.1188/11.CJON.519-525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1092-1095            Impact factor:   1.027


  37 in total

1.  External bioenergy increases intracellular free calcium concentration and reduces cellular response to heat stress.

Authors:  Juliann G Kiang; Diane Marotta; Mietek Wirkus; Margaret Wirkus; Wayne B Jonas
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Healing touch.

Authors:  J L Mentgen
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.208

3.  The Integrative Medicine Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Authors:  Barrie R Cassileth
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Preservation of immune function in cervical cancer patients during chemoradiation using a novel integrative approach.

Authors:  Susan K Lutgendorf; Elizabeth Mullen-Houser; Daniel Russell; Koen Degeest; Geraldine Jacobson; Laura Hart; David Bender; Barrie Anderson; Thomas E Buekers; Michael J Goodheart; Michael H Antoni; Anil K Sood; David M Lubaroff
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone healing in a rabbit tibial osteotomy model.

Authors:  D C Fredericks; J V Nepola; J T Baker; J Abbott; B Simon
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Factors predicting the use of complementary therapies in a multi-ethnic sample of early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Alferi; M H Antoni; G Ironson; K M Kilbourn; C S Carver
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Biofield therapies: helpful or full of hype? A best evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Shamini Jain; Paul J Mills
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2010-03

8.  Therapeutic massage and healing touch improve symptoms in cancer.

Authors:  Janice Post-White; Mary Ellen Kinney; Kay Savik; Joanna Berntsen Gau; Carol Wilcox; Irving Lerner
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.279

9.  An assessment of the utilization of complementary and alternative medication in women with gynecologic or breast malignancies.

Authors:  Marisa A Navo; Julie Phan; Christy Vaughan; J Lynn Palmer; Laura Michaud; Kellie L Jones; Diane C Bodurka; Karen Basen-Engquist; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; John J Kavanagh; Judith A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Phase I clinical study of a static magnetic field combined with anti-neoplastic chemotherapy in the treatment of human malignancy: initial safety and toxicity data.

Authors:  Joseph R Salvatore; Joanne Harrington; Thomas Kummet
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.010

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Effects of Oscillatory Biofield Therapy on Pain and Functional Limitations Associated with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Nourbakhsh; Thomas J Bell; Jason Benson Martin; Amir Massoud Arab
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Decreased Cortisol and Pain in Breast Cancer: Biofield Therapy Potential.

Authors:  Alice Running
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Complementary Therapies for Symptom Management in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Aanchal Satija; Sushma Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

4.  Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study).

Authors:  Cathy Gaillard; Laure Allain; Hélène Legros; Sylvie Brucato; Yohann Desgue; Christophe Rouillon; Laure Peyro-Saint-Paul; Anne Dompmartin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Energy therapies in advanced practice oncology: an evidence-informed practice approach.

Authors:  Pamela J Potter
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2013-05

6.  Healing touch in radiation therapy: is the benefit tangible?

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Guy; Sacha Bard-Reboul; Jane-Chloé Trone; Alexis Vallard; Sophie Espenel; Julien Langrand-Escure; Anis Hamrouni; Majed Ben Mrad; Stéphanie Morisson; Patrick Michaud; Nicolas Magné; Chloé Rancoule
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.