Literature DB >> 21951674

Determination of foetal sex in pregnancies at risk of haemophilia: a qualitative study exploring the clinical practices and attitudes of health professionals in the United Kingdom.

M Hill1, C Compton, C Lewis, H Skirton, L S Chitty.   

Abstract

In pregnancies at risk of haemophilia, foetal sex determination is used to plan perinatal management and to guide the offer of invasive testing in pregnancies with a male foetus. Traditionally ultrasound from 12 weeks gestation has been used, but recently options for early foetal sex determination have increased following the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) using cell free foetal DNA in maternal plasma. This study was conducted to identify clinical practices and examine health professional attitudes regarding NIPD for foetal sex determination. A qualitative approach using one-to-one semi structured interviews was used to enable an in-depth exploration of current practice, introduction and use of NIPD and benefits and disadvantages of offering NIPD. Interviews were conducted with consultant haematologists (N = 7), specialist haemophilia nurses (N = 7), genetic counsellors (N = 6), consultants in clinical genetics (N = 5), specialist midwives (N = 2) and obstetricians (N = 5) from 24 services across the United Kingdom (UK). Key differences in how NIPD for foetal sexing is utilized throughout the UK were identified. Some services routinely offered NIPD to all carriers of haemophilia or to all carriers of severe haemophilia, others discussed the value of NIPD with all or primarily offered NIPD as a first step to invasive testing. This study informs our understanding of how NIPD is being utilized and provides unique insights into current practice. The identification of variation between services in how prenatal testing options are offered has implications for future policy and guidelines for prenatal care.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21951674     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02653.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  13 in total

1.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alexander; Susan Kelly; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The use of cffDNA in fetal sex determination during the first trimester of pregnancy of female DMD carriers.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Qiaofang Hou; Tao Li; Yan Chu; Qiannan Guo; Bing Kang; Shixiu Liao
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2012-11

4.  A Qualitative Study to Explore the Views and Attitudes towards Prenatal Testing in Adults Who Have Muenke Syndrome and their Partners.

Authors:  Julie Phipps; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for fetal sex determination: benefits and disadvantages from the service users' perspective.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Heather Skirton; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of De Novo Mutations.

Authors:  Ravit Peretz-Machluf; Tom Rabinowitz; Noam Shomron
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

7.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics.

Authors:  Zuzana Deans; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty; Celine Lewis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  An easy test but a hard decision: ethical issues concerning non-invasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive disorders.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Client views and attitudes to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for sickle cell disease, thalassaemia and cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Cecilia Compton; Madhavi Karunaratna; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.