Literature DB >> 2195139

Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol injection in the management of trigeminal neuralgia: long-term follow-up results.

T Fujimaki1, T Fukushima, S Miyazaki.   

Abstract

The results in 122 patients with trigeminal neuralgia who underwent percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol injection are presented. Eighty patients were followed from 38 to 54 months. The recurrence rate at 54 months was 72% (Kaplan-Meier analysis), and the median pain-free interval was 32 months. Complications associated with the procedure were significantly high: 63% of the patients had definite hypesthesia of the face and 29% had unpleasant dysesthesias, including two cases of anesthesia dolorosa. Sensory disturbances were most frequent in patients who had received a previous alcohol block procedure. Among the patients without previous peripheral procedures, 50% developed sensory disturbances. Because of the high rates of recurrence and sensory disturbances, the authors prefer microvascular decompression for the management of trigeminal neuralgia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2195139     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.2.0212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  12 in total

1.  Relation between sensory disturbance and outcome after retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy.

Authors:  A T Bergenheim; M I Hariz; L V Laitinen; M Olivecrona; L Rabow
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia caused by an inserted prosthesis: report of two cases.

Authors:  T Fujimaki; K Hoya; T Sasaki; T Kirino
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Long-term results after percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  H Slettebø; H Hirschberg; K F Lindegaard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Prognostic factors in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Analysis of a differential therapeutic approach.

Authors:  H J Steiger
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Evaluation of surgical procedures for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  K S Ong; S B Keng
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2003

6.  Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia : short-term follow-up results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Bülent Tucer; Mehmet Ali Ekici; Serkan Demirel; Seyit Kağan Başarslan; Rahmi Kemal Koç; Bülent Güçlü
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-07-31

7.  Pharmacological versus microvascular decompression approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical outcomes and direct costs.

Authors:  Laurinda Lemos; Carlos Alegria; Joana Oliveira; Ana Machado; Pedro Oliveira; Armando Almeida
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  In Reply: Pain Outcomes Following Microvascular Decompression for Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Holste; Alvin Y Chan; John D Rolston; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  [Microvascular decompresion for trigeminal neuralgia, report of 36 cases and literature review].

Authors:  Alvaro Campero; Pablo Ajler; Abraham Agustín Campero
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-10-13

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for trigeminal neuralgia: Cyberknife vs microvascular decompression.

Authors:  Rosanna Tarricone; Giovanni Aguzzi; Francesco Musi; Laura Fariselli; Andrea Casasco
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.