Literature DB >> 21951361

Classical conditioning of sexual response in women: a replication study.

Stephanie Both1, Marieke Brauer, Ellen Laan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: According to incentive motivation models, sexual stimuli play a crucial role in eliciting sexual arousal, desire, and behavior. Therefore, it seems highly valuable to investigate the process through which stimuli acquire motivational value. Although many theories of human sexual behavior assume that sexual stimuli obtain arousing properties through classical conditioning, systematic research on classical conditioning of sexual responses in humans is scarce. Recently, however, our research group observed conditioned genital responses in women using a differential conditioning procedure and genital vibrostimulation as unconditional stimulus (US). AIM: The aim of the present experiment was to perform an extended replication of this previous study to test the efficacy of our conditioning paradigm.
METHODS: A differential conditioning experiment was conducted in 32 sexually functional women. Neutral pictures served as conditional stimuli (CSs) and genital vibrostimulation as US. Only one CS (the CS+) was followed by the US during the acquisition phase. Conditioned responses were assessed during the extinction phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA) and skin conductance level were assessed, and ratings of affective value and sexual arousal were obtained.
RESULTS: As expected, during the extinction phase, VPA was higher in response to the CS+ than to the CS-. Also, the CS+ tended to be evaluated as more positive and as more sexually arousing than the CS-. In addition, the magnitude of conditioned subjective affect was related to scores on the Sexual Inhibition\Sexual Excitation Scales. Skin conductance levels showed no conditioning effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Genital and subjective sexual responses were successfully modulated by the differential conditioning paradigm. This replication of our previous study confirms the effectiveness of our conditioning procedure and indicates that it may provide a fruitful paradigm for further research on associative sexual reward learning in humans.
© 2011 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21951361     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02453.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  8 in total

1.  Foundations of Erobotics.

Authors:  Simon Dubé; Dave Anctil
Journal:  Int J Soc Robot       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 2.  Sex for fun: a synthesis of human and animal neurobiology.

Authors:  Janniko R Georgiadis; Morten L Kringelbach; James G Pfaus
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Conditioning of Sexual Interests and Paraphilias in Humans Is Difficult to See, Virtually Impossible to Test, and Probably Exactly How It Happens: A Comment on Hsu and Bailey (2020).

Authors:  James G Pfaus; Gonzalo R Quintana; Conall E Mac Cionnaith; Christine A Gerson; Simon Dubé; Genaro A Coria-Avila
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-05-27

4.  A randomized, placebo-controlled laboratory study of the effects of D-cycloserine on sexual memory consolidation in women.

Authors:  S Both; R J B Van Veen; M Brom; P T M Weijenborg
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Field conditioning of sexual arousal in humans.

Authors:  Heather Hoffmann; Kathryn Peterson; Hana Garner
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2012-03-15

6.  Extinction and renewal of conditioned sexual responses.

Authors:  Mirte Brom; Ellen Laan; Walter Everaerd; Philip Spinhoven; Stephanie Both
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of a dopamine antagonist on conditioning of sexual arousal in women.

Authors:  Mirte Brom; Ellen Laan; Walter Everaerd; Philip Spinhoven; Baptist Trimbos; Stephanie Both
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Modeling Human Sexual Motivation in Rodents: Some Caveats.

Authors:  Olivia Le Moëne; Anders Ågmo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.