Literature DB >> 21950447

Group testing for case identification with correlated responses.

Samuel D Lendle1, Michael G Hudgens, Bahjat F Qaqish.   

Abstract

This article examines group testing procedures where units within a group (or pool) may be correlated. The expected number of tests per unit (i.e., efficiency) of hierarchical- and matrix-based procedures is derived based on a class of models of exchangeable binary random variables. The effect on efficiency of the arrangement of correlated units within pools is then examined. In general, when correlated units are arranged in the same pool, the expected number of tests per unit decreases, sometimes substantially, relative to arrange<span class="Species">ments that ignore information about correlation.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21950447      PMCID: PMC3384753          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01674.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Optimized determination of T cell epitope responses.

Authors:  Mario Roederer; Richard A Koup
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Comprehensive epitope analysis of cross-clade Gag-specific T-cell responses in individuals with early HIV-1 infection in the US epidemic.

Authors:  Uma Malhotra; Jessica Nolin; James I Mullins; M Juliana McElrath
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of test error.

Authors:  Hae-Young Kim; Michael G Hudgens; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Daniel J Westreich; Christopher D Pilcher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Peptide selection for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 CTL-based vaccine evaluation.

Authors:  Fusheng Li; Uma Malhotra; Peter B Gilbert; Natalie R Hawkins; Ann C Duerr; Juliana M McElrath; Lawrence Corey; Steven G Self
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  The use of a square array scheme in blood testing.

Authors:  R M Phatarfod; A Sudbury
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Enhanced detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Nef-specific T cells recognizing multiple variants in early HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Uma Malhotra; Fusheng Li; Jessica Nolin; Megan Allison; Hong Zhao; James I Mullins; Steve Self; M Juliana McElrath
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Enhanced cellular immune responses elicited by an engineered HIV-1 subtype B consensus-based envelope DNA vaccine.

Authors:  Jian Yan; Hanna Yoon; Sanjeev Kumar; Mathura P Ramanathan; Natasha Corbitt; Michele Kutzler; Anlan Dai; Jean D Boyer; David B Weiner
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  Priming immunization with DNA augments immunogenicity of recombinant adenoviral vectors for both HIV-1 specific antibody and T-cell responses.

Authors:  Richard A Koup; Mario Roederer; Laurie Lamoreaux; Jennifer Fischer; Laura Novik; Martha C Nason; Brenda D Larkin; Mary E Enama; Julie E Ledgerwood; Robert T Bailer; John R Mascola; Gary J Nabel; Barney S Graham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimizing peptide matrices for identifying T-cell antigens.

Authors:  Melissa L Precopio; Tiffany R Butterfield; Joseph P Casazza; Susan J Little; Douglas D Richman; Richard A Koup; Mario Roederer
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  Moving to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine efficacy trials: defining T cell responses as potential correlates of immunity.

Authors:  Nina D Russell; Michael G Hudgens; Richard Ha; Colin Havenar-Daughton; M Juliana McElrath
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  6 in total

1.  Group testing case identification with biomarker information.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Positively Correlated Samples Save Pooled Testing Costs.

Authors:  Yi-Jheng Lin; Che-Hao Yu; Tzu-Hsuan Liu; Cheng-Shang Chang; Wen-Tsuen Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng       Date:  2021-05-20

3.  Array testing for multiplex assays.

Authors:  Peijie Hou; Joshua M Tebbs; Dewei Wang; Christopher S McMahan; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Pooled-Peptide Epitope Mapping Strategies Are Efficient and Highly Sensitive: An Evaluation of Methods for Identifying Human T Cell Epitope Specificities in Large-Scale HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials.

Authors:  Andrew Fiore-Gartland; Bryce A Manso; David P Friedrich; Erin E Gabriel; Greg Finak; Zoe Moodie; Tomer Hertz; Stephen C De Rosa; Nicole Frahm; Peter B Gilbert; M Juliana McElrath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pooled testing of traced contacts under superspreading dynamics.

Authors:  Stratis Tsirtsis; Abir De; Lars Lorch; Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Network-Informed Constrained Divisive Pooled Testing Assignments.

Authors:  Daniel K Sewell
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-07-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.