Literature DB >> 21947978

Electrocardiographic changes during vasodilator SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: does it affect diagnosis or prognosis?

Talhat Azemi1, Mridula Rai, Purvi Parwani, Sarkis Baghdasarian, Fawad Kazi, Alan W Ahlberg, Giselle Cyr, Deborah Katten, David O'Sullivan, Daniel Fram, Gary V Heller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significance of electrocardiographic (ECG) changes during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is controversial. We examined the diagnostic and prognostic significance of ECG changes during vasodilator single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) MPI.
METHODS: We studied consecutive patients who underwent vasodilator SPECT MPI from 1995 to 2009. Patients with baseline ECG abnormalities, previous history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery or myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as >70% stenosis of any vessel or ≥50% stenosis of left main. Mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.5 years for cardiac events (cardiac death and non-fatal MI).
RESULTS: Of patients in the diagnostic cohort, ST depression was associated with increased incidence of CAD with abnormal (P = .020 and P <.001) but not in those with normal perfusion (P = .342). Of 3,566 patients with follow-up in the prognostic cohort, including 130 (5.0%) with ST depression and normal perfusion, the presence of ST depression ≥1 mm did not affect the outcomes in any summed stress score category.
CONCLUSIONS: ST depression ≥1 mm during vasodilator SPECT MPI is associated with CAD in patients with abnormal perfusion, but provides no additional risk stratification beyond concomitant perfusion imaging, including those with normal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947978     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9457-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  34 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Patients with adenosine-induced ST-segment depressions and normal myocardial perfusion imaging: cardiac outcomes at 24 months.

Authors:  Jyoti Sharma; Christine Roncari; Kenneth N Giedd; John T Fox; Yumiko Kanei
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Prognostic implications of normal exercise SPECT thallium images in patients with strongly positive exercise electrocardiograms.

Authors:  B D Schalet; J G Kegel; J Heo; B L Segal; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Can the reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on stress gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT predict a future cardiac event?

Authors:  Nunzia Rosa Petix; Stelvio Sestini; Gabriella Marcucci; Angela Coppola; Angela Arena; Franco Nassi; Andrea Taiti; Vincenzo Guarnaccia; Alberto Mennuti; Vincenzo Mazzoni
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; I Cohen; H Lewin; A Amanullah; X Kang; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Underestimation of extent and severity of coronary artery disease by dipyridamole stress thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients taking antianginal drugs.

Authors:  T Sharir; B Rabinowitz; S Livschitz; I Moalem; J Baron; E Kaplinsky; P Chouraqui
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by controlled coronary vasodilation with adenosine and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise.

Authors:  M S Verani; J J Mahmarian; J B Hixson; T M Boyce; R A Staudacher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Does myocardial perfusion scintigraphy demonstrate clinical usefulness in patients with markedly positive exercise tests? An assessment of the method in a high-risk subset.

Authors:  R Krishnan; J Lu; M W Dae; E H Botvinick
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes during vasodilator stress testing in patients with normal SPECT images.

Authors:  Elizabeth Klodas; Todd D Miller; Timothy F Christian; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  4 in total

1.  The vasodilator stress ECG: should depression cause anxiety?

Authors:  Brian G Abbott
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Diagnostic and prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes with regadenoson-stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Rami Doukky; Adebayo Olusanya; Raj Vashistha; Abhimanyu Saini; Ibtihaj Fughhi; Khaled Mansour; Abiy Nigatu; Kara Confer; Shannon A Sims
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Myocardial stunning by gated SPECT: An old tool reinvented in a stunning turn.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Siddharth Singh; Ayman Farag; Stephanie El-Hajj; Jack Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.952

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.