Literature DB >> 21947599

An extended 15 Hz ERG protocol (2): data of normal subjects and patients with achromatopsia, CSNB1, and CSNB2.

Mieke M C Bijveld1, Frans C C Riemslag, Astrid M L Kappers, Frank P Hoeben, Maria M van Genderen.   

Abstract

The amplitude versus flash strength curve of 15 Hz electroretinograms (ERGs) shows two minima. The minima are caused by interactions between the primary and the secondary rod pathways (first minimum), and the secondary rod pathway and the cone-driven pathway (second minimum). Furthermore, cone pathway contributions cause higher-order harmonics to occur in the responses. We measured 15 Hz ERGs in 20 healthy subjects to determine normal ranges and in patients to verify our hypotheses on the contributions of the different pathways and to investigate the clinical application. We analyzed the amplitudes and phases of the 15, 30, and 45 Hz components in the ERGs. The overall shape of the 15 Hz amplitude curves was similar in all normal subjects and showed two minima. The 30 and 45 Hz amplitude curves increased for stimuli of high flash strengths indicating cone pathway contributions. The 15 Hz amplitude curve of the responses of an achromat was similar to that of the normal subjects for low flash strengths and showed a minimum, indicating normal primary and secondary rod pathway function. There was no second minimum, and there were no higher-order harmonics, consistent with absent cone pathway function. The 15 Hz ERGs in CSNB1 and CSNB2 patients were similar and of low amplitude for flash strengths just above where the first minimum normally occurs. We could determine that in the CSNB1 patients, the responses originate from the cone pathway, while in the CSNB2 patients, the responses originate from the secondary rod pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947599     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9293-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  39 in total

Review 1.  Rod vision: pathways and processing in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  S A Bloomfield; R F Dacheux
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Night blindness and abnormal cone electroretinogram ON responses in patients with mutations in the GRM6 gene encoding mGluR6.

Authors:  Thaddeus P Dryja; Terri L McGee; Eliot L Berson; Gerald A Fishman; Michael A Sandberg; Kenneth R Alexander; Deborah J Derlacki; Aruna S Rajagopalan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Convergence and segregation of the multiple rod pathways in mammalian retina.

Authors:  Béla Völgyi; Michael R Deans; David L Paul; Stewart A Bloomfield
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  CNGB3 achromatopsia with progressive loss of residual cone function and impaired rod-mediated function.

Authors:  Naheed Wali Khan; Bernd Wissinger; Susanne Kohl; Paul A Sieving
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Intrasession variability of the full-field ERG.

Authors:  Grant D Hochstein; Fanni E Molnar; Michael F Marmor
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry.

Authors:  K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Rod-cone interaction in flicker detection.

Authors:  N J Coletta; A J Adams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Primate Retinal Signaling Pathways: Suppressing ON-Pathway Activity in Monkey With Glutamate Analogues Mimics Human CSNB1-NYX Genetic Night Blindness.

Authors:  Naheed W Khan; Mineo Kondo; Kelaginamane T Hiriyanna; Jeff A Jamison; Ronald A Bush; Paul A Sieving
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Rod and rod-driven function in achromatopsia and blue cone monochromatism.

Authors:  Anne Moskowitz; Ronald M Hansen; James D Akula; Susan E Eklund; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Dingcai Cao; Frederick T Collison; Gerald A Fishman; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Rod- and cone-isolated flicker electroretinograms and their response summation characteristics.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Ultrastructural localization of GPR179 and the impact of mutant forms on retinal function in CSNB1 patients and a mouse model.

Authors:  Jan Klooster; Maria M van Genderen; Minzhong Yu; Ralph J Florijn; Frans C C Riemslag; Arthur A B Bergen; Ronald G Gregg; Neal S Peachey; Maarten Kamermans
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The morphology of human rod ERGs obtained by silent substitution stimulation.

Authors:  J Maguire; N R A Parry; J Kremers; I J Murray; D McKeefry
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Rod Electroretinograms Elicited by Silent Substitution Stimuli from the Light-Adapted Human Eye.

Authors:  John Maguire; Neil R A Parry; Jan Kremers; Deepika Kommanapalli; Ian J Murray; Declan J McKeefry
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.