Literature DB >> 21947434

Use of cone beam computed tomography in otolaryngologic treatments.

Hamdi Cakli1, Cemal Cingi, Yazgi Ay, Fatih Oghan, Torun Ozer, Ercan Kaya.   

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows us to evaluate 3-dimensional (3D) morphology of the maxillofacial skeleton and also used in dentomaxillofacial imaging to solve complex diagnostic and treatment planning problems such as craniofacial fractures, temporamandibular dysfunctions or sinus imaging. CBCT uses a rectangular or round 2D detector, which allows a single rotation of the gantry to generate a scan of the entire region of interest. Technological and application-specific factors such as development of compact, relatively low-cost, high-quality, large, flat-panel detector arrays; the availability of low-cost computers with processing power sufficient for cone beam image reconstruction; the fabrication of highly efficient radiograph tubes capable of multiple exposures necessary for cone beam scanning at prices lower than those currently used for fan beam CT; and limited volume scanning (e.g., head and neck) eliminating the need for subsecond gantry rotation speeds make this possible. The objective of this study is to review published evidence for CBCT having an important role in ORL treatments. We aimed to review all the available literature about the CBCT imagination in ORL treatments. Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Ovid. Additional literature was retrieved from reference lists in the articles. Systematic analysis of the literature from 1998 to 2010 was performed. A total of 40 abstracts were evaluated independently by two members of the project group, and 38 articles were included in the review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947434     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1781-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  30 in total

1.  A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents.

Authors:  C A Aboudara; D Hatcher; I L Nielsen; A Miller
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Three-dimensional CT with a modified C-arm image intensifier: feasibility.

Authors:  Ulrich Linsenmaier; Clemens Rock; Ekkehard Euler; Stefan Wirth; Roland Brandl; Dorothea Kotsianos; Wolf Mutschler; Klaus Jürgen Pfeifer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: a reliability and accuracy study.

Authors:  Hakan El; Juan Martin Palomo
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Dental age estimation through volume matching of teeth imaged by cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Reinhilde Jacobs; Guy Willems
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  V Kumar; J B Ludlow; A Mol; L Cevidanes
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging.

Authors:  Robert A Mischkowski; Reinhard Pulsfort; Lutz Ritter; Jörg Neugebauer; Hans Georg Brochhagen; Erwin Keeve; Joachim E Zöller
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-07-05

Review 7.  Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review.

Authors:  A M Hussain; G Packota; P W Major; C Flores-Mir
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results.

Authors:  P Mozzo; C Procacci; A Tacconi; P T Martini; I A Andreis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Clinical utility of intraoperative volume computed tomography scanner for endoscopic sinonasal and skull base procedures.

Authors:  Pete S Batra; Seth J Kanowitz; Martin J Citardi
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

10.  Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Brett J Garrett; Joseph M Caruso; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; James R Farrage; Jay S Kim; Guy D Taylor
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  7 in total

1.  Radiological Study of Maxillary Sinus using CBCT: Relationship between Mucosal Thickening and Common Anatomic Variants in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Marco Capelli; Patrizia Gatti
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

2.  Analysis of Lacrimal Duct Morphology from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dacryocystography in a Japanese Population.

Authors:  Jutaro Nakamura; Tomoyuki Kamao; Arisa Mitani; Nobuhisa Mizuki; Atsushi Shiraishi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Diagnostic usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography versus multi-detector computed tomography for sinonasal structure evaluation.

Authors:  Miran Han; Hyun Jun Kim; Jin Wook Choi; Do-Yang Park; Jang Gyu Han
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT.

Authors:  Anni Suomalainen; Elmira Pakbaznejad Esmaeili; Soraya Robinson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-01-10

Review 5.  Use of cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Ilson Sepúlveda; Thomas Schmidt; Enrique Platín
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-09-23

6.  Bilateral Fracture of the Handle Malleus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ilson Sepulveda; J Patricio Ulloa; Alfredo Santamaría; Francisco Rivas-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2018-11-15

Review 7.  Optimized imaging of the midface and orbits.

Authors:  Sönke Langner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.