OBJECTIVES: To analyse our results of gastric-emptying scintigraphy in relation to presenting symptoms, and examine in detail the clinical significance of rapid gastric emptying (RGE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of 642 consecutive patients who underwent a solid gastric-emptying scintigraphy in our department over an 11-year period were retrospectively reviewed with particular emphasis to the presenting symptoms and the clinical profile of patients, especially of those who showed an accelerated pattern of emptying. RESULTS: Seventy (11%) patients were clinically suspected to have a RGE and 572 (89%) patients had presumed gastroparesis. Gastric emptying was found to be normal in 290 (45%), rapid in 182 (28%) and delayed in 170 (27%) patients. Normal, rapid and delayed gastric emptying were seen, respectively, in 17 (24%), 48 (69%) and five (7%) patients with the clinical suspicion of dumping and 273 (48%), 134 (23%) and 165 (29%) patients with suspected gastroparesis. The positive predictive value of clinical suspicion for RGE was 62%, whereas the positive predictive value of delayed gastric emptying was 29%. Of the 182 patients with RGE, 144 (79%) were found to have no obvious explanation for this result; reactive hypoglycaemia was present in a quarter of these patients, but diarrhoea was seen only in 3%. CONCLUSION: Upper gastrointestinal symptoms have a poor clinical specificity to the actual rate of gastric emptying on scintigraphy. Diarrhoea as a symptom does not appear to be associated frequently with RGE, but our results confirm its relationship with hypoglycaemia. The majority of patients with a rapid emptying on gastric-emptying scintigraphy have no identifiable cause for an accelerated motility. Scintigraphic gastric-emptying studies provide a reliable and noninvasive method of investigation in patients where conventional investigations have failed to establish the cause of upper gastrointestinal dysfunction.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse our results of gastric-emptying scintigraphy in relation to presenting symptoms, and examine in detail the clinical significance of rapid gastric emptying (RGE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of 642 consecutive patients who underwent a solid gastric-emptying scintigraphy in our department over an 11-year period were retrospectively reviewed with particular emphasis to the presenting symptoms and the clinical profile of patients, especially of those who showed an accelerated pattern of emptying. RESULTS: Seventy (11%) patients were clinically suspected to have a RGE and 572 (89%) patients had presumed gastroparesis. Gastric emptying was found to be normal in 290 (45%), rapid in 182 (28%) and delayed in 170 (27%) patients. Normal, rapid and delayed gastric emptying were seen, respectively, in 17 (24%), 48 (69%) and five (7%) patients with the clinical suspicion of dumping and 273 (48%), 134 (23%) and 165 (29%) patients with suspected gastroparesis. The positive predictive value of clinical suspicion for RGE was 62%, whereas the positive predictive value of delayed gastric emptying was 29%. Of the 182 patients with RGE, 144 (79%) were found to have no obvious explanation for this result; reactive hypoglycaemia was present in a quarter of these patients, but diarrhoea was seen only in 3%. CONCLUSION: Upper gastrointestinal symptoms have a poor clinical specificity to the actual rate of gastric emptying on scintigraphy. Diarrhoea as a symptom does not appear to be associated frequently with RGE, but our results confirm its relationship with hypoglycaemia. The majority of patients with a rapid emptying on gastric-emptying scintigraphy have no identifiable cause for an accelerated motility. Scintigraphic gastric-emptying studies provide a reliable and noninvasive method of investigation in patients where conventional investigations have failed to establish the cause of upper gastrointestinal dysfunction.
Authors: Jan S Burgerhart; Pim W J van Rutte; Michela A L Edelbroek; Dirk N J Wyndaele; Johannes F Smulders; Paul C van de Meeberg; Peter D Siersema; André J P M Smout Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Sanjeev Singh; Jeff McCrary; Archana Kedar; Stephen Weeks; Brian Beauerle; Andrew Weeks; Omer Endashaw; Chris Lahr; Warren Starkebaum; Thomas Abell Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 4.924
Authors: Emidio Scarpellini; Joris Arts; George Karamanolis; Anna Laurenius; Walter Siquini; Hidekazu Suzuki; Andrew Ukleja; Andre Van Beek; Tim Vanuytsel; Serhat Bor; Eugene Ceppa; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Marloes Emous; Heinz Hammer; Per Hellström; Martine Laville; Lars Lundell; Ad Masclee; Patrick Ritz; Jan Tack Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Jutta Keller; Gabrio Bassotti; John Clarke; Phil Dinning; Mark Fox; Madhusudan Grover; Per M Hellström; Meiyun Ke; Peter Layer; Carolina Malagelada; Henry P Parkman; S Mark Scott; Jan Tack; Magnus Simren; Hans Törnblom; Michael Camilleri Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 46.802