Literature DB >> 21946007

Moving faster while preserving accuracy.

O Missenard1, L Fernandez.   

Abstract

Achieving movements with accuracy despite the inevitable variability of the neuromuscular mechanisms is an important everyday life problem, which has to be solved for the production of any adapted motor act, such as walking, writing, catching, or pointing. To solve this problem when we have to make goal-directed movements as fast as possible, we systematically increase movement time when accuracy requirements increase, a ubiquitous phenomenon qualified as speed-accuracy trade-off. It has been proposed that this speed-accuracy trade-off reflects an optimal compromise between speed and accuracy in the presence of biological noise and that increasing movement speed inevitably leads to decreased motor accuracy. However, the recent finding that muscle cocontraction improves movement accuracy may challenge this view and begs the question of how movement speed control and cocontraction control coexist. Here, we show that humans are in fact able to move faster while preserving movement accuracy, by using a strategy where muscles are cocontracted around the joint. As this energetically costly cocontraction strategy was not naturally used, this result has two important implications. It first demonstrates that a speed modulation strategy is preferred to a cocontraction strategy for fast, accurate movements, and it also suggests that energy economy prevents us to execute accurate movements as fast as we could do. Consequently, we propose that the mechanisms underlying the speed-accuracy trade-off are more complex than previously thought, and suggest the existence of a previously unknown speed-energy-accuracy trade-off for goal-directed movements. Copyright Â
© 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946007     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  11 in total

1.  Two-phase strategy of neural control for planar reaching movements: II--relation to spatiotemporal characteristics of movement trajectory.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Yury P Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The optimal neural strategy for a stable motor task requires a compromise between level of muscle cocontraction and synaptic gain of afferent feedback.

Authors:  Jakob L Dideriksen; Francesco Negro; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Self-efficacy and Reach Performance in Individuals With Mild Motor Impairment Due to Stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Janelle Rocktashel; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Motor inhibition affects the speed but not accuracy of aimed limb movements in an insect.

Authors:  Delphine Calas-List; Anthony J Clare; Alexandra Komissarova; Thomas A Nielsen; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  "It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it": does obesity affect perceptual motor control ability of adults on the speed and accuracy of a discrete aiming task?

Authors:  David Gaul; Laure Fernandez; Johann Issartel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The impact of weight classification on safety: timing steps to adapt to external constraints.

Authors:  S V Gill
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Evaluation of speed-accuracy trade-off in a computer task in individuals with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Deborah Cristina Gonçalves Luiz Fernani; Maria Tereza Artero Prado; Talita Dias da Silva; Thais Massetti; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Fernando Henrique Magalhães; Helen Dawes; Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Hammering Does Not Fit Fitts' Law.

Authors:  Tadej Petrič; Cole S Simpson; Aleš Ude; Auke J Ijspeert
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Postural compensation strategy depends on the severity of vestibular damage.

Authors:  Lara A Thompson; Csilla Haburcakova; Richard F Lewis
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-03-22

10.  Are accuracy and reaction time affected via different processes?

Authors:  Martijn J Mulder; Leendert van Maanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.