Literature DB >> 21945682

Controlled permeation of cell membrane by single bubble acoustic cavitation.

Y Zhou1, K Yang, J Cui, J Y Ye, C X Deng.   

Abstract

Sonoporation is the membrane disruption generated by ultrasound and has been exploited as a non-viral strategy for drug and gene delivery. Acoustic cavitation of microbubbles has been recognized to play an important role in sonoporation. However, due to the lack of adequate techniques for precise control of cavitation activities and real-time assessment of the resulting sub-micron process of sonoporation, limited knowledge has been available regarding the detail processes and correlation of cavitation with membrane disruption at the single cell level. In the current study, we developed a combined approach including optical, acoustical, and electrophysiological techniques to enable synchronized manipulation, imaging, and measurement of cavitation of single bubbles and the resulting cell membrane disruption in real-time. Using a self-focused femtosecond laser and high frequency ultrasound (7.44MHz) pulses, a single microbubble was generated and positioned at a desired distance from the membrane of a Xenopus oocyte. Cavitation of the bubble was achieved by applying a low frequency (1.5MHz) ultrasound pulse (duration 13.3 or 40μs) to induce bubble collapse. Disruption of the cell membrane was assessed by the increase in the transmembrane current (TMC) of the cell under voltage clamp. Simultaneous high-speed bright field imaging of cavitation and measurements of the TMC were obtained to correlate the ultrasound-generated bubble activities with the cell membrane poration. The change in membrane permeability was directly associated with the formation of a sub-micrometer pore from a local membrane rupture generated by bubble collapse or bubble compression depending on ultrasound amplitude and duration. The impact of the bubble collapse on membrane permeation decreased rapidly with increasing distance (D) between the bubble (diameter d) and the cell membrane. The effective range of cavitation impact on membrane poration was determined to be D/d=0.75. The maximum mean radius of the pores was estimated from the measured TMC to be 0.106±0.032μm (n=70) for acoustic pressure of 1.5MPa (duration 13.3μs), and increased to 0.171±0.030μm (n=125) for acoustic pressure of 1.7MPa and to 0.182±0.052μm (n=112) for a pulse duration of 40μs (1.5MPa). These results from controlled cell membrane permeation by cavitation of single bubbles revealed insights and key factors affecting sonoporation at the single cell level.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21945682      PMCID: PMC3258473          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  52 in total

1.  DNA delivery to cells in vivo by ultrasound.

Authors:  Thomas P McCreery; Robert H Sweitzer; Evan C Unger; Sean Sullivan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2004

2.  Trapping cavitation bubbles with a self-focused laser beam.

Authors:  Jing Yong Ye; Guoqing Chang; Theodore B Norris; Christine Tse; Marwa J Zohdy; Kyle W Hollman; Matthew O'Donnell; James R Baker
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Optical observations of acoustical radiation force effects on individual air bubbles.

Authors:  Peggy Palanchon; Piero Tortoli; Ayache Bouakaz; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  Claus-Dieter Ohl; Manish Arora; Roy Ikink; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Michael Delius; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

Authors:  William D O'Brien
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 6.  Shear stress in cells generated by ultrasound.

Authors:  Junru Wu
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Targeted retroviral gene delivery using ultrasound.

Authors:  Sarah L Taylor; Ahad A Rahim; Nigel L Bush; Jeffrey C Bamber; Colin D Porter
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.565

8.  Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Wayne Kreider; Andrew A Brayman; Michael R Bailey; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Acoustic response of compliable microvessels containing ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Targeting of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis to rat myocardium using ultrasonic destruction of microbubbles.

Authors:  G Korpanty; S Chen; R V Shohet; J Ding; B Yang; P A Frenkel; P A Grayburn
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.250

View more
  46 in total

1.  Shock Wave-Induced Damage of a Protein by Void Collapse.

Authors:  Edmond Y Lau; Max L Berkowitz; Eric Schwegler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Hydrodynamic determinants of cell necrosis and molecular delivery produced by pulsed laser microbeam irradiation of adherent cells.

Authors:  Jonathan L Compton; Amy N Hellman; Vasan Venugopalan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Mechanisms of microbubble-facilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Fan; Ronald E Kumon; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2014-04

5.  Two-bubble acoustic tweezing cytometry for biomechanical probing and stimulation of cells.

Authors:  Di Chen; Yubing Sun; Madhu S R Gudur; Yi-Sing Hsiao; Ziqi Wu; Jianping Fu; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Enhanced cavitation by using two consecutive ultrasound waves at different frequencies.

Authors:  Xinmai Yang; Janggun Jo
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Membrane blebbing as a recovery manoeuvre in site-specific sonoporation mediated by targeted microbubbles.

Authors:  Ruen Shan Leow; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Laser-Activated Polymeric Microcapsules for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: In Vitro Feasibility.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Tom van Rooij; Ilya Skachkov; Emilie Blazejewski; Gert Veldhuis; Nico de Jong; Klazina Kooiman; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Acoustic Cavitation-Mediated Delivery of Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acids with Phase-Shift Nano-Emulsions.

Authors:  Mark T Burgess; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jonathan T Sutton; Kevin J Haworth; Gail Pyne-Geithman; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.