Literature DB >> 21944142

Evaluation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results after treatment with casting and bracing for the acutely injured posterior cruciate ligament.

Jin Hwan Ahn1, Sang Hak Lee, Sang Hee Choi, Joon Ho Wang, Sung Won Jang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of nonoperative management of acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.
METHODS: From February 2001 to January 2008, 49 consecutive patients with acute (<4 weeks), isolated PCL injuries underwent nonoperative treatment with cast immobilization and PCL braces. Of these patients, 38 who satisfied our inclusion criteria and could be followed up for a minimum of 24 months (median, 51 months) were enrolled in our study. Functional outcomes were evaluated at follow-up with the Lysholm knee scoring system, Hospital for Special Surgery knee scoring system, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and objective knee scoring systems. PCL injury status on MRI was assessed using a different scale for initial and follow-up MRI.
RESULTS: The grade of posterior instability was significantly improved from initial grades of I in 13 patients (34%) and II in 25 patients (66%) to follow-up grades of 0 in 3 patients (8%), I in 21 patients (55%), and II in 14 patients (37%) (P = .007). The mean side-to-side difference in posterior translation measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) was initially 6.7 mm and significantly improved to 5.2 mm at the latest follow-up (P < .001). At latest follow-up, the mean Lysholm knee score, Hospital for Special Surgery knee score, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score were 88, 91, and 83, respectively. The continuity of the PCL on follow-up MRI showed statistically less posterior instability on both physical examination (P = .010) and KT-1000 arthrometer testing (P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: Our active, nonoperative method of casting and bracing with attached tibial supporters, which was designed to prevent posterior displacement at the knee, yielded satisfactory functional and MRI results in the majority of patients at intermediate-term follow-up. The continuity of the PCL with low signal intensity on follow-up MRI was a predictable factor for a favorable prognosis in patients with acute PCL injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21944142     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

Review 1.  A historical perspective of PCL bracing.

Authors:  Kyle S Jansson; Kerry E Costello; Luke O'Brien; Coen A Wijdicks; Robert F Laprade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Quantification of functional brace forces for posterior cruciate ligament injuries on the knee joint: an in vivo investigation.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Sean D Smith; Katharine J Wilson; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Operative management of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries improves stability and reduces the incidence of secondary osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wouter Schroven; G Vles; J Verhaegen; M Roussot; J Bellemans; S Konan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The necessity of clinical application of tibial reduction for detection of underestimated posterolateral rotatory instability in combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficient knee.

Authors:  Han-Jun Lee; Yong-Beom Park; Young-Bong Ko; Seong-Hwan Kim; Hyeok-Bin Kwon; Dong-Seok Yu; Young-Bok Jung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Evaluating posterior cruciate ligament injury by using two-dimensional ultrasonography and sonoelastography.

Authors:  Lin-Yi Wang; Tsung-Hsun Yang; Yu-Chi Huang; Wen-Yi Chou; Chung-Cheng Huang; Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The effect of a dynamic PCL brace on patellofemoral compartment pressures in PCL-and PCL/PLC-deficient knees.

Authors:  Tyler Welch; Thomas Keller; Ruben Maldonado; Melodie Metzger; Karen Mohr; Ronald Kvitne
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 7.  Optimal management of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: current perspectives.

Authors:  K Donald Shelbourne; Rodney W Benner; Jonathan D Ringenberg; Tinker Gray
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2017-04-05

Review 8.  Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2: surgical techniques, outcomes and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Bálint Zsidai; Nyaluma N Wagala; Jonathan D Hughes; Alexandra Horvath; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.