Literature DB >> 21944100

Annual endoscopy and urine cytology for the surveillance of bladder tumors after enterocystoplasty for congenital bladder anomalies.

Ty T Higuchi1, Janelle A Fox, Douglas A Husmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is currently recommended that patients with congenital bladder anomalies managed by enterocystoplasty undergo annual surveillance with urine cytology and endoscopy. We reviewed our experience with this protocol and suggest modifications based on this experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 65 patients 10 years or more after enterocystoplasty were placed on an annual surveillance protocol consisting of interval medical history, renal-bladder ultrasound, serum B12, electrolytes, creatinine, urinalysis, urine cytology and endoscopy.
RESULTS: Of the 65 patients 50 (77%) with enterocystoplasty (ileal in 40 and colonic in 10) remain on the protocol. Median age at the initiation of surveillance was 28 years (range 24 to 40) with a median time from augmentation of 15 years (range 12 to 29). During the first 5 years of surveillance 26 of 250 cytology results (10.5%) were suspicious for cancer. Further evaluation revealed no evidence of malignancy. Specificity for cytology was 90% with unknown sensitivity. Of 250 surveillance endoscopic evaluations 4 lesions (1.6%) were identified and biopsied/removed. Pathological evaluation revealed 1 adenomatous polyp, 1 squamous metaplasia and 2 nephrogenic adenomas. Due to the low event rate and high cost routine cytology and endoscopy were discontinued after each patient completed 5 years of followup and annual evaluations were maintained. No tumors developed during the median surveillance interval of 15 years (range 12 to 20). Currently median patient age is 42 years (range 36 to 59) and median time since augmentation is 27 years (range 23 to 40).
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the low incidence of malignancy, lack of proven benefit and enhanced cost containment we recommend that annual surveillance endoscopy and cytology be discontinued.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21944100     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Complications in adulthood for patients with paediatric genitourinary reconstruction.

Authors:  Oluwarotimi S Nettey; Diana K Bowen; Yahir Santiago-Lastra; Peter Metcalfe; Stephanie J Kielb
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Diagnosis, management, and surveillance of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction - Executive summary.

Authors:  Alex Kavanagh; Richard Baverstock; Lysanne Campeau; Kevin Carlson; Ashley Cox; Duane Hickling; Genviève Nadeau; Lynn Stothers; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Long-term survival after radical cystectomy and mesenteric lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma arising from augmented bladder with lymph node metastasis: a case report.

Authors:  Takahiko Soma; Minato Yokoyama; Yusuke Uchida; Susumu Kirimura; Hajime Tanaka; Soichiro Yoshida; Yoh Matsuoka; Yasuhisa Fujii
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2020-09-01

Review 5.  Urodynamic studies in spinal cord tethering.

Authors:  James T Kearns; Domenic Esposito; Beverly Dooley; David Frim; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Augmented bladders and urinary diversions.

Authors:  Peter Metcalfe; Shuba De; Greg Bailly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Urinary considerations for adult patients with spinal dysraphism.

Authors:  Paul W Veenboer; Laetitia M O de Kort; Rafal J Chrzan; Tom P V M de Jong
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  The argument against screening for bladder cancer in neuro-urological patients.

Authors:  Blayne Welk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  A case of tubular adenoma developing after bladder augmentation: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Yutaka Hayashi; Satoko Shiyanagi; Itsuro Nagae; Tetsuo Ishizaki; Kazuhiko Kasuya; Kenji Katsumata; Atsuyuki Yamataka; Akihiko Tsuchida
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-11

10.  Tubular Adenoma in the Indiana Pouch of a Patient With a History of Bladder Exstrophy.

Authors:  Madeleine G Manka; Carlos Santoni; E James Wright; Susan L Gearhart
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.