Literature DB >> 21942513

A modified fetal heart rate tracing interpretation system for prediction of cesarean section.

William T Schnettler1, Jennifer Rogers, Rachel E Barber, Michele R Hacker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a modified version of the 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) interpretation system upon admission decreases cesarean delivery risk.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study ascribed a modified category to the first 30 min of fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings in labor. Category I was divided into two subsets (Ia and Ib) by the presence of accelerations. Category II was divided into four subsets (IIa-IId) based on baseline FHR, variability, response to stimulation and decelerations. Log-binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: A category was ascribed to 910 women. Most FHR tracings were Category Ia (65.8%), Ib (7.7%), IIb (11.8%) and IId (14.0%). Category Ib tracings (fewer than two accelerations) were 2.26 (95% CI: 1.13-4.52) times more likely to result in cesarean delivery for abnormal FHR tracing than Category Ia tracings. A similar increase in risk was seen when comparing Category IIb and Category IId with Category Ia.
CONCLUSION: Application of a modified version of the 2008 NICHD FHR interpretation system to the initial 30 min of labor can identify women at increased risk of cesarean delivery for abnormal FHR tracing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21942513      PMCID: PMC3703943          DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.614975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  10 in total

1.  Problems with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation and patient management.

Authors:  Roger K Freeman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: any role for a fetal admission test?

Authors:  A Elimian; P Lawlor; R Figueroa; V Wiencek; D Garry; J G Quirk
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-06

Review 3.  Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.

Authors:  Ernest M Graham; Scott M Petersen; Dana K Christo; Harold E Fox
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic of failure.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; D Devane; G M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

7.  Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Chad K Klauser; Thomas C Woodring; Maureen Sanderson; Everett F Magann; John C Morrison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Joel D Larma; Anadir M Silva; Cynthia J Holcroft; Richard E Thompson; Pamela K Donohue; Ernest M Graham
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Trends in intrapartum fetal death, 1979-2003.

Authors:  Colin A Walsh; Moya B McMenamin; Michael E Foley; Sean F Daly; Michael S Robson; Michael P Geary
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines.

Authors:  George A Macones; Gary D V Hankins; Catherine Y Spong; John Hauth; Thomas Moore
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.661

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.