Literature DB >> 21099609

Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic of failure.

David A Grimes, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

Electronic fetal monitoring has failed as a public health screening program. Nevertheless, most of the four million low-risk women giving birth in the United States each year continue to undergo this screening. The failure of this program should have been anticipated and thus avoided had the accepted principles of screening been considered before its introduction. All screening tests have poor positive predictive value when searching for rare conditions such as fetal death in labor or cerebral palsy. This problem is aggravated when the screening test does not have good validity as is the case with electronic fetal monitoring. Because of low-prevalence target conditions and mediocre validity, the positive predictive value of electronic fetal monitoring for fetal death in labor or cerebral palsy is near zero. Stated alternatively, almost every positive test result is wrong. To avoid such costly errors in the future, the prerequisites for any screening program must be fulfilled before the program is begun.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21099609     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fae39f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

Review 1.  The Causal Inference Framework: A Primer on Concepts and Methods for Improving the Study of Well-Woman Childbearing Processes.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesarean section: assumptions versus evidence.

Authors:  Karin B Nelson; Thomas P Sartwelle; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Electronic Fetal Monitoring: A Defense Lawyer's View.

Authors:  Thomas P Sartwelle
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

4.  A modified fetal heart rate tracing interpretation system for prediction of cesarean section.

Authors:  William T Schnettler; Jennifer Rogers; Rachel E Barber; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-09-27

5.  Perpetuating Myths, Fables, and Fairy Tales: A Half Century of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

Authors:  Thomas P Sartwelle; James C Johnston; Berna Arda
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2015-11-20

6.  The Fetal Reserve Index Significantly Outperforms ACOG Category System in Predicting Cord Blood Base Excess and pH: A Methodological Failure of the Category System.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; David W Britt; Robert D Eden; Paula Gallagher; Shara M Evans; Barry S Schifrin
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 7.  Resistance to Change.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; David W Britt
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.

Authors:  Toby Schonfeld
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Fetal heart rate monitoring: from Doppler to computerized analysis.

Authors:  Ji Young Kwon; In Yang Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16

10.  Mode of delivery among nulliparous women with single, cephalic, term pregnancies: The WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health, 2004-2008.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Ana Pilar Betrán; Joshua P Vogel; Robert L Goldenberg; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.