Literature DB >> 21942477

General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57.

Lambert W T Schuwirth1, Cees P M van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

There are no scientific theories that are uniquely related to assessment in medical education. There are many theories in adjacent fields, however, that can be informative for assessment in medical education, and in the recent decades they have proven their value. In this AMEE Guide we discuss theories on expertise development and psychometric theories, and the relatively young and emerging framework of assessment for learning. Expertise theories highlight the multistage processes involved. The transition from novice to expert is characterised by an increase in the aggregation of concepts from isolated facts, through semantic networks to illness scripts and instance scripts. The latter two stages enable the expert to recognise the problem quickly and form a quick and accurate representation of the problem in his/her working memory. Striking differences between experts and novices is not per se the possession of more explicit knowledge but the superior organisation of knowledge in his/her brain and pairing it with multiple real experiences, enabling not only better problem solving but also more efficient problem solving. Psychometric theories focus on the validity of the assessment - does it measure what it purports to measure and reliability - are the outcomes of the assessment reproducible. Validity is currently seen as building a train of arguments of how best observations of behaviour (answering a multiple-choice question is also a behaviour) can be translated into scores and how these can be used at the end to make inferences about the construct of interest. Reliability theories can be categorised into classical test theory, generalisability theory and item response theory. All three approaches have specific advantages and disadvantages and different areas of application. Finally in the Guide, we discuss the phenomenon of assessment for learning as opposed to assessment of learning and its implications for current and future development and research.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21942477     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  23 in total

1.  Online assessment in medical education-current trends and future directions.

Authors:  K Walsh
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.875

2.  The need to evaluate question writers' views and the costs of constructed-response versus selected-response calculations questions.

Authors:  Kieran Walsh
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Letters to the editor.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2013

4.  Using a Curricular Vision to Define Entrustable Professional Activities for Medical Student Assessment.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Christy Boscardin; Tracy B Fulton; Catherine Lucey; Sandra Oza; Arianne Teherani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  A Call for an Integrated Program of Assessment.

Authors:  David W Fielding; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Test of integrated professional skills: objective structured clinical examination/simulation hybrid assessment of obstetrics-gynecology residents' skill integration.

Authors:  Abigail Ford Winkel; Colleen Gillespie; Marissa T Hiruma; Alice R Goepfert; Sondra Zabar; Demian Szyld
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

7.  Procedure-specific assessment tool for flexible pharyngo-laryngoscopy: gathering validity evidence and setting pass-fail standards.

Authors:  Jacob Melchiors; K Petersen; T Todsen; A Bohr; Lars Konge; Christian von Buchwald
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  The educational impact of assessment: a comparison of DOPS and MCQs.

Authors:  Kate A Cobb; George Brown; Debbie A D C Jaarsma; Richard A Hammond
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  The objective structured clinical examination revisited for postgraduate trainees in general practice.

Authors:  Birgitte Schoenmakers; Johan Wens
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2014-03-04

10.  What steps are necessary to create written or web-based selected-response assessments?

Authors:  Matt Morgan; Valérie Dory; Stuart Lubarsky; Kieran Walsh
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.