Literature DB >> 21942261

Exploratory studies in sensory reinforcement in male rats: effects of methamphetamine.

Amy M Gancarz1, Lisham Ashrafioun, Michele A San George, Kathy A Hausknecht, Larry W Hawk, Jerry B Richards.   

Abstract

Understanding sensory reinforcement and the effects of stimulant drugs on sensory reinforcers is potentially important for understanding their influence on addiction processes. Experiment 1 explored the reinforcing properties of a visual stimulus and the effects of methamphetamine (METH) on responding maintained by a visual reinforcer (VRF) in male rats. Snout poke responses to the active alternative produced the VRF according to variable interval (VI) schedules of reinforcement, and responses to an inactive alternative had no programmed effect. Experiment 2 explored the effects of METH on choice between the VRF and a water reinforcer (H2ORF) using concurrent VI schedules in male rats. In Experiment 1, response-contingent onset of the VRF produced an increase in both the relative frequency and absolute rate of active responding. The rate of both active and inactive responding declined across the 40-min test sessions. METH did not differentially enhance active responding for the VRF. Instead, METH nondifferentially increased the rate of responding and attenuated the within-session decline of responding. In Experiment 2, METH differentially increased the rate of responding for the VRF relative to the H2ORF. The results of these exploratory experiments indicate that the reinforcing effects of the VRF were weak and transient. In addition, METH treatment increased responding, and the specificity of the enhancement of METH was dependent upon the testing conditions. Potential explanations of these differences, such as novelty and reinforcer type, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21942261      PMCID: PMC3591505          DOI: 10.1037/a0025701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  25 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Drug enhanced sensory contingent bar pressing: comparing the effect of contingent and noncontingent sensory change.

Authors:  P H Glow; A Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1973-09-28

3.  Locomotor activity in a novel environment predicts both responding for a visual stimulus and self-administration of a low dose of methamphetamine in rats.

Authors:  Amy M Gancarz; Michele A San George; Lisham Ashrafioun; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 4.  Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation.

Authors:  Catharine H Rankin; Thomas Abrams; Robert J Barry; Seema Bhatnagar; David F Clayton; John Colombo; Gianluca Coppola; Mark A Geyer; David L Glanzman; Stephen Marsland; Frances K McSweeney; Donald A Wilson; Chun-Fang Wu; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Responding maintained by primary reinforcing visual stimuli is increased by nicotine administration in rats.

Authors:  Bethany R Raiff; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Amphetamine-induced behavior, dopamine release, and c-fos mRNA expression: modulation by environmental novelty.

Authors:  A Badiani; M M Oates; H E Day; S J Watson; H Akil; T E Robinson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Habituation as a determinant of human food intake.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Jennifer L Temple; James N Roemmich; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  What is reinforced by phasic dopamine signals?

Authors:  Peter Redgrave; Kevin Gurney; John Reynolds
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-10-26

9.  Dopamine: the salient issue.

Authors:  Mark A Ungless
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  The influence of amphetamine on sensory and conditioned reinforcement: evidence for the re-selection hypothesis of dopamine function.

Authors:  Neil E Winterbauer; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-30
View more
  13 in total

1.  Chronic variable stress and intravenous methamphetamine self-administration - Role of individual differences in behavioral and physiological reactivity to novelty.

Authors:  S B Taylor; L R Watterson; P R Kufahl; N E Nemirovsky; S E Tomek; C D Conrad; M F Olive
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Effect of yohimbine on reinstatement of operant responding in rats is dependent on cue contingency but not food reward history.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Chen; Kimberly A Fiscella; Samuel Z Bacharach; Gianluigi Tanda; Yavin Shaham; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  Effects of novelty and methamphetamine on conditioned and sensory reinforcement.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Michael A Kausch; Amy M Gancarz; Linda J Beyley; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Sensory reinforcement as a predictor of cocaine and water self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Amy M Gancarz; Mykel A Robble; Michael A Kausch; David R Lloyd; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Strong genetic influences on measures of behavioral-regulation among inbred rat strains.

Authors:  J B Richards; D R Lloyd; B Kuehlewind; L Militello; M Paredez; L Solberg Woods; A A Palmer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Nicotine enhances operant responding for qualitatively distinct reinforcers under maintenance and extinction conditions.

Authors:  Scott T Barret; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Tobacco smoking may delay habituation of reinforcer effectiveness in humans.

Authors:  Joshua L Karelitz; Kenneth A Perkins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Habituation and the reinforcing effectiveness of visual stimuli.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Amy M Gancarz; Lisham Ashrafioun; Michael A Kausch; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Social reinforcement as alternative to sucrose reinforcement is increased by nicotine and methylphenidate in male Fischer-344 rats.

Authors:  Connor D Martin; Heather M Bool; Anthony M George; Katelyn A Carr; Leonard H Epstein; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Association between locomotor response to novelty and light reinforcement: sensory reinforcement as a rodent model of sensation seeking.

Authors:  Amy M Gancarz; Mykel A Robble; Michael A Kausch; David R Lloyd; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.