Literature DB >> 29691605

Social reinforcement as alternative to sucrose reinforcement is increased by nicotine and methylphenidate in male Fischer-344 rats.

Connor D Martin1, Heather M Bool2, Anthony M George2, Katelyn A Carr3, Leonard H Epstein3, Larry W Hawk4, Jerry B Richards2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stimulant drugs such as nicotine (NIC) and methylphenidate (MPH) are hypothesized to increase the reinforcing value of sensory stimuli, thus increasing the effectiveness of such reinforcers as alternatives to sucrose reinforcers.
METHODS: Inbred Fischer-344 rats (n = 30) were assigned to three groups: saline (SAL; n = 10), nicotine (NIC; n = 10), or methylphenidate (MPH; n = 10). Testing was done in three phases: sucrose only, (SUC), sucrose and drug (SUC/DRUG), and sucrose, drug, and social reinforcement (SUC/DRUG/SOC). During the SUC phase, rats were trained on a progressive ratio 5 (PR5) reinforcement schedule for sucrose (20% solution). In the SUC/DRUG phase, animals were treated with SAL, NIC (0.4 mg/kg, n = 10 SC), or MPH (2.0 mg/kg, n = 10 IP) 30 min prior to testing. In the SUC/DRUG/SOC phase, animals continued receiving drug treatment, and social reinforcement was introduced concurrently with the sucrose reinforcer. The progressive ratio for each reinforcer ran independently of the others. Reinforcing value was measured as break point (BP), the highest number of responses resulting in a reinforcer.
RESULTS: SAL-treated animals showed no significant change in sucrose BP. MPH-treated animals showed decreased sucrose BP in the SUC/DRUG phase, with a further reduction in the SUC/DRUG/SOC phase. NIC-treated animals decreased sucrose BP only when a social alternative was offered.
CONCLUSION: Both NIC and MPH reduce the sucrose BP in the presence of a social alternative. The decrease in sucrose responding, coupled with increased social responding, suggests that the social alternative acted as an effective alternative reinforcer to sucrose. From a translational perspective, these results suggest that stimulant drugs such as NIC and MPH may increase the effectiveness of treatments that use alternative social reinforcers to decrease eating.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral economics; Operant; Progressive ratio; Social behavior

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29691605     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-4896-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  16 in total

1.  The challenge of identifying behavioral alternatives to food: clinic and field studies.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; James N Roemmich; Richard I Stein; Rocco A Paluch; Colleen K Kilanowski
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2005-12

2.  Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy II: economic complements.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; John R Smethells; Eric E Ewan; Steven R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Nicotine gum as a substitute for cigarettes: a behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  T A Shahan; A L Odum; W K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.

Authors:  Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Sheri Booth; Maysa Gharib; Laure Craven; Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  A behavioral economic analysis of concurrently available money and cigarettes.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; S T Higgins; J R Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Environmental stimuli promote the acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Anthony R White; Nadia Chaudhri; Sheri Booth; Maysa A Gharib; Alycia Hoffman; Kenneth A Perkins; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-07-13       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; F Fay Evans-Martin; Sheri Booth; Maysa A Gharib; Laure A Clements; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Methylphenidate reduces energy intake and dietary fat intake in adults: a mechanism of reduced reinforcing value of food?

Authors:  Gary S Goldfield; Claudio Lorello; Eric Doucet
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 9.  The behavioral economics of drug self-administration: a review and new analytical approach for within-session procedures.

Authors:  Brandon S Bentzley; Kimberly M Fender; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Nicotine and methamphetamine disrupt habituation of sensory reinforcer effectiveness in male rats.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Kathryn A Hausknecht; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stimulus functions of nicotine.

Authors:  Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.