Literature DB >> 21940762

Visual salience dominates early visuomotor competition in reaching behavior.

Daniel K Wood1, Jason P Gallivan, Craig S Chapman, Jennifer L Milne, Jody C Culham, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated whether visual salience influences the competition between potential targets during reach planning. Participants initiated rapid pointing movements toward multiple potential targets, with the final target being cued only after the reach was initiated. We manipulated visual salience by varying the luminance of potential targets. Across two separate experiments, we demonstrate that initial reach trajectories are directed toward more salient targets, even when there are twice as many targets (and therefore twice the likelihood of the final target appearing) on the opposite side of space. We also show that this salience bias is time-dependent, as evidenced by the return of spatially averaged reach trajectories when participants were given an additional 500-ms preview of the target display prior to the cue to move. This study shows both when and to what extent task-irrelevant luminance differences affect the planning of reaches to multiple potential targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21940762     DOI: 10.1167/11.10.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Goal-directed action is automatically biased towards looming motion.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Jonathan Sit; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Dorsal premotor cortex: neural correlates of reach target decisions based on a color-location matching rule and conflicting sensory evidence.

Authors:  Émilie Coallier; Thomas Michelet; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The sequential encoding of competing action goals involves dynamic restructuring of motor plans in working memory.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Natasha A R Bowman; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Reaching decisions during ongoing movements.

Authors:  Julien Michalski; Andrea M Green; Paul Cisek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Authors:  Jonas Lins; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Dissociable effects of salience on attention and goal-directed action.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Brian A Anderson; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Decision-making in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Context-dependent sequential effects of target selection for action.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Action plan co-optimization reveals the parallel encoding of competing reach movements.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Kathryn S Barton; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  It is the flash which appears, the movement will follow: Investigating the relation between spatial attention and obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; H Chris Dijkerman; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.