Literature DB >> 21940755

DNA cytometry testing for cervical cancer screening: approaches and reporting standards for new technologies.

Graham A Colditz1, John Crowley.   

Abstract

Evaluation of new technologies requires rigorous methods to provide unbiased estimates of the performance and so inform future clinical practice. We review evidence on DNA cytometry reported earlier in this journal and point to the standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy as a metric against which this article can be evaluated. The cross-sectional nature of the data and incomplete reporting limit the clinical utility of the study. With application of improved reporting standards for diagnostic tests and improved design and evaluation of new technologies for screening, we may better inform practices to improve clinical outcomes and population health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21940755      PMCID: PMC3653770          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  5 in total

1.  DNA ploidy cytometry testing for cervical cancer screening in China - letter.

Authors:  David M Garner; Martial D Guillaud; Calum E MacAulay
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The quality of reporting of primary test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: application of the STARD criteria.

Authors:  Tara J Selman; R Katie Morris; Javier Zamora; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 3.  How to evaluate emerging technologies in cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Guglielmo Ronco; Jack Cuzick; Nicolas Wentzensen; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

5.  DNA ploidy cytometry testing for cervical cancer screening in China (DNACIC Trial): a prospective randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Hua Tong; Rong Shen; ZhuMing Wang; YanJing Kan; YiQuan Wang; FengShan Li; FuZhou Wang; Jie Yang; XiRong Guo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 12.531

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.