Literature DB >> 21939039

Assessing stream restoration effectiveness at reducing nitrogen export to downstream waters.

Solange Filoso1, Margaret A Palmer.   

Abstract

The degradation of headwater streams is common in urbanized coastal areas, and the role these streams play in contributing to downstream pollution is a concern among natural resource managers and policy makers. Thus, many urban stream restoration efforts are increasingly focused on reducing the downstream flux of pollutants. In regions that suffer from coastal eutrophication, it is unclear whether stream restoration does in fact reduce nitrogen (N) flux to downstream waters and, if so, by how much and at what cost. In this paper, we evaluate whether stream restoration implemented to improve water quality of urban and suburban streams in the Chesapeake Bay region, USA, is effective at reducing the export of N in stream flow to downstream waters. We assessed the effectiveness of restored streams positioned in the upland vs. lowland regions of Coastal Plain watershed during both average and stormflow conditions. We found that, during periods of low discharge, lowland streams that receive minor N inputs from groundwater or bank seepage reduced in-stream N fluxes. Furthermore, lowland streams with the highest N concentrations and lowest discharge were the most effective. During periods of high flow, only those restoration projects that converted lowland streams to stream-wetland complexes seemed to be effective at reducing N fluxes, presumably because the design promoted the spillover of stream flow onto adjacent floodplains and wetlands. The observed N-removal rates were relatively high for stream ecosystems, and on the order of 5% of the inputs to the watershed. The dominant forms of N entering restored reaches varied during low and high flows, indicating that N uptake and retention were controlled by distinctive processes during different hydrological conditions. Therefore, in order for stream restoration to effectively reduce N fluxes exported to downstream waters, restoration design should include features that enhance the processing and retention of different forms of N, and for a wide range of flow conditions. The use of strategic designs that match the dominant attributes of a stream such as position in the watershed, influence of groundwater, dominant flow conditions, and N concentrations is crucial to assure the success of restoration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939039     DOI: 10.1890/10-0854.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  9 in total

1.  Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; Michael G McManus
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.443

2.  Are Urban Stream Restoration Plans Worth Implementing?

Authors:  Auri Sarvilinna; Virpi Lehtoranta; Turo Hjerppe
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Long-term assessment of floodplain reconnection as a stream restoration approach for managing nitrogen in ground and surface waters.

Authors:  Paul M Mayer; Michael J Pennino; Tammy A Newcomer-Johnson; Sujay S Kaushal
Journal:  Urban Ecosyst       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Concentration-discharge relationships derived from a larger regional dataset as a tool for watershed management.

Authors:  Sarah C D'Amario; Henry F Wilson; Marguerite A Xenopoulos
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 6.105

5.  The Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling System: Overview and Recommendations for Future Development.

Authors:  Raleigh R Hood; Gary W Shenk; Rachel L Dixon; Sean M C Smith; William P Ball; Jesse O Bash; Rich Batiuk; Kathy Boomer; Damian C Brady; Carl Cerco; Peter Claggett; Kim de Mutsert; Zachary M Easton; Andrew J Elmore; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Lora A Harris; Thomas F Ihde; Iara Lacher; Li Li; Lewis C Linker; Andrew Miller; Julia Moriarty; Gregory B Noe; George Onyullo; Kenneth Rose; Katie Skalak; Richard Tian; Tamie L Veith; Lisa Wainger; Donald Weller; Yinglong Joseph Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.512

6.  Regenerative stormwater conveyance (RSC) for reducing nutrients in urban stormwater runoff depends upon carbon quantity and quality.

Authors:  Shuiwang Duan; Paul M Mayer; Sujay S Kaushal; Barret M Wessel; Thomas Johnson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of excess nitrogen in human-influenced landscapes: a guide for watershed managers.

Authors:  Elodie Passeport; Philippe Vidon; Kenneth J Forshay; Lora Harris; Sujay S Kaushal; Dorothy Q Kellogg; Julia Lazar; Paul Mayer; Emilie K Stander
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Managing artificially drained low-gradient agricultural headwaters for enhanced ecosystem functions.

Authors:  Samuel C Pierce; Robert Kröger; Reza Pezeshki
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-10

9.  Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface.

Authors:  Anna M Lavelle; Nic R Bury; Francis T O'Shea; Michael A Chadwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.