Literature DB >> 21938574

Evaluation of complications related to therapeutic colonoscopy using the bipolar snare.

Tsutomu Saraya1, Hiroaki Ikematsu, Kuang I Fu, Chihiro Tsunoda, Yusuke Yoda, Yasuhiro Oono, Takashi Kojima, Tomonori Yano, Takahiro Horimatsu, Yasushi Sano, Kazuhiro Kaneko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The complications with therapeutic colonoscopy reported to date have been associated with the monopolar snare, and the frequency of complications related to use of the bipolar snare is uncertain. This study aimed too investigate the incidence of bleeding and perforation associated with the bipolar snare and to identify the risk factors for bleeding.
METHODS: Between October 2001 and December 2008, all patients with colorectal polyps treated using the bipolar snare were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data were assembled from an electronic database. The incidence of bleeding and perforation was investigated, and the risk factors for bleeding also were determined using multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: This study collected 4,719 patients with 10,513 lesions. Perforation occurred for eight patients (0.17%) and bleeding in 66 patients (1.4%). Age younger than 60 years was a significant risk factor for bleeding (P < 0.01). The incidence of bleeding was significantly higher for lesions 10 mm or larger than for lesions smaller than 10 mm (P < 0.001). In terms of macroscopic type, pedunculated lesions bled significantly more often than lesions of other shapes (P < 0.001). Lesions in the rectum bled significantly more frequently (P < 0.001) than lesions at other sites. High-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer developed bleeding significantly more often than other histologic types (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age younger than 60 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.42), lesion size of 10 mm or larger (OR, 2.60), pedunculated shape (OR, 3.40), and rectal location (OR, 3.55) were significant risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The complication rates for the bipolar snare appear to be comparable with those for the monopolar snare based on comparison of the results reported in the literature. Age (<60 years), lesion size (≥ 10 mm), macroscopic type (pedunculated), and lesion location (rectum) are independent risk factors for bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21938574     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1914-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  36 in total

Review 1.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists.

Authors:  A Sieg; U Hachmoeller-Eisenbach; T Eisenbach
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Risk assessment for delayed hemorrhagic complication of colonic polypectomy: polyp-related factors and patient-related factors.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Watabe; Yutaka Yamaji; Makoto Okamoto; Shintaro Kondo; Miki Ohta; Tsuneo Ikenoue; Jun Kato; Goichi Togo; Masayuki Matsumura; Haruhiko Yoshida; Takao Kawabe; Masao Omata
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  President's address. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel.

Authors:  B Morson
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1974-06

5.  Bipolar snare polypectomy--a safer technique for electrocoagulation of large polyp stalks.

Authors:  C B Williams; R C de Peyer
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Colonoscopic perforation and bleeding of the colon can be treated safely without surgery.

Authors:  Tim S Ker; Nir Wasserberg; Robert W Beart
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study.

Authors:  H Machida; Y Sano; Y Hamamoto; M Muto; T Kozu; H Tajiri; S Yoshida
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Colorectal tumours and pit pattern.

Authors:  S Kudo; S Hirota; T Nakajima; S Hosobe; H Kusaka; T Kobayashi; M Himori; A Yagyuu
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Efficacy, risk factors and complications of endoscopic polypectomy: ten year experience at a single center.

Authors:  Pierluigi Consolo; Carmelo Luigiano; Giuseppe Strangio; Maria-Grazia Scaffidi; Giuseppa Giacobbe; Giovanna Di Giuseppe; Agata Zirilli; Luigi Familiari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years.

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perforation following colorectal endoscopy: what happens beyond the endoscopy suite?

Authors:  Michael S Tam; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

2.  Endoscopic resection of a vocal cord polyp with a bipolar snare in a patient with cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  Hiroaki Minamino; Yasuaki Nagami; Kazunari Tominaga; Naoki Matsushita; Satoshi Sugimori; Masatsugu Shiba; Toshio Watanabe; Hiroyoshi Iguchi; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Tetsuo Arakawa
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-12

Review 3.  Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Roisin Bevan; Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich; Matthew D Rutter; Douglas Rex; Evelien Dekker; Thierry Ponchon; Michael Bretthauer; Jaroslaw Regula; Brian Saunders; Cesare Hassan; Michael J Bourke; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Siwan Thomas Gibson; Matt D Rutter; Phil Baragwanath; Rupert Pullan; Mark Feeney; Neil Haslam
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model.

Authors:  Kensuke Shinmura; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Motohiro Kojima; Hiroshi Nakamura; Shozo Osera; Yusuke Yoda; Keisuke Hori; Yasuhiro Oono; Atsushi Ochiai; Tomonori Yano
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  A Novel Bipolar Polypectomy Snare Can Be an Alternative Choice for Endoscopic Resection.

Authors:  Shengsen Chen; Danping Zhou; Rongwei Ruan; Jiangping Yu; Yandong Li; Yuanshun Liu; Shi Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.