Literature DB >> 21937951

Late compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle: impact on mortality.

Álvaro Castellanos-Ortega1, Borja Suberviola, Luis A García-Astudillo, Fernando Ortiz, Javier Llorca, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez.   

Abstract

Early compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle has been suggested to reduce mortality. However, few data are available about the impact of late compliance with the bundle on outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess whether the completion of the resuscitation bundle within the first 6 h after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), but beyond the specific time limit of the various bundle interventions, is related to an improvement in survival. This prospective, cohort study included 753 patients recruited from September 2005 until August 2010 with severe sepsis/septic shock in the three medical-surgical ICUs of a tertiary academic medical center. We assessed the compliance with the different tasks included in the resuscitation bundle. Furthermore, we ascertained within the first 6 h after ICU admission the compliance with those tasks not carried out within their specific time limits; we have termed this variable "bundle improvement in the ICU." Septic shock was present in 88.1%. The overall in-hospital mortality was 31.6%. In 51.5%, there was bundle improvement in the ICU; this variable was associated with a lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.78]). That association was observed only when the time from severe sepsis onset to ICU admission was 6 h or less. Importantly, similar results were found after excluding all patients with severe sepsis (rapid responders) and those with refractory shock (nonresponders). The task with highest improvement was the achievement of central venous oxygen saturation 70% or greater in 39% of patients. Compliance with the resuscitation bundle even beyond the recommended time is associated with improvement in survival in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21937951     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182360f7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  9 in total

Review 1.  Early management of sepsis with emphasis on early goal directed therapy: AME evidence series 002.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Yucai Hong; Nathan J Smischney; Han-Pin Kuo; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Jordi Rello; Win Sen Kuan; Christian Jung; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Marc Leone; Herbert Spapen; David Grimaldi; Sven Van Poucke; Steven Q Simpson; Patrick M Honore; Stefan Hofer; Pietro Caironi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A nurse-driven screening tool for the early identification of sepsis in an intermediate care unit setting.

Authors:  Elsie Gyang; Lisa Shieh; Lynn Forsey; Paul Maggio
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives.

Authors:  Faheem W Guirgis; Lisa Jones; Rhemar Esma; Alice Weiss; Kaitlin McCurdy; Jason Ferreira; Christina Cannon; Laura McLauchlin; Carmen Smotherman; Dale F Kraemer; Cynthia Gerdik; Kendall Webb; Jin Ra; Frederick A Moore; Kelly Gray-Eurom
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Outcome of delayed resuscitation bundle achievement in emergency department patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Chang Hwan Sohn; Seung Mok Ryoo; Dong Woo Seo; Jae Ho Lee; Bum Jin Oh; Kyoung Soo Lim; Jin Won Huh; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 5.  Early goal-directed resuscitation of patients with septic shock: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Ravi G Gupta; Sarah M Hartigan; Markos G Kashiouris; Curtis N Sessler; Gonzalo M L Bearman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Could a protocol based on early goal-directed therapy improve outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the Intensive Care Unit setting?

Authors:  Iuri Christmann Wawrzeniak; Sergio Henrique Loss; Maria Cristina Martins Moraes; Fabiane Lopes De La Vega; Josue Almeida Victorino
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03

7.  A boosting inspired personalized threshold method for sepsis screening.

Authors:  Chen Feng; Paul Griffin; Shravan Kethireddy; Yajun Mei
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 1.416

8.  The adverse effect of emergency department crowding on compliance with the resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Tae Gun Shin; Ik Joon Jo; Dae Jong Choi; Mun Ju Kang; Kyeongman Jeon; Gee Young Suh; Min Seob Sim; So Yeon Lim; Keun Jeong Song; Yeon Kwon Jeong
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Anja Kathrin Jaehne; Namita Jayaprakash; Matthew W Semler; Sara Hegab; Angel Coz Yataco; Geneva Tatem; Dhafer Salem; Steven Moore; Kamran Boka; Jasreen Kaur Gill; Jayna Gardner-Gray; Jacqueline Pflaum; Juan Pablo Domecq; Gina Hurst; Justin B Belsky; Raymond Fowkes; Ronald B Elkin; Steven Q Simpson; Jay L Falk; Daniel J Singer; Emanuel P Rivers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.