Literature DB >> 34113056

A boosting inspired personalized threshold method for sepsis screening.

Chen Feng1, Paul Griffin2, Shravan Kethireddy3, Yajun Mei1.   

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the biggest risks to patient safety, with a natural mortality rate between 25% and 50%. It is difficult to diagnose, and no validated standard for diagnosis currently exists. A commonly used scoring criteria is the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA). It demonstrates very low specificity in ICU populations, however. We develop a method to personalize thresholds in qSOFA that incorporates easily to measure patient baseline characteristics. We compare the personalized threshold method to qSOFA, five previously published methods that obtain an optimal constant threshold for a single biomarker, and to the machine learning algorithms based on logistic regression and AdaBoosting using patient data in the MIMIC-III database. The personalized threshold method achieves higher accuracy than qSOFA and the five published methods and has comparable performance to machine learning methods. Personalized thresholds, however, are much easier to adopt in real-life monitoring than machine learning methods as they are computed once for a patient and used in the same way as qSOFA, whereas the machine learning methods are hard to implement and interpret.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sepsis; boosting; clinical risk score; personalized thresholds; screening

Year:  2020        PMID: 34113056      PMCID: PMC8188988          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1716695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  40 in total

1.  Classification accuracy and cut point selection.

Authors:  Xinhua Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Validation of the new Sepsis-3 definitions: proposal for improvement in early risk identification.

Authors:  E J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; T Tsaganos; I Tsangaris; M Lada; C Routsi; D Sinapidis; M Koupetori; M Bristianou; G Adamis; K Mandragos; G N Dalekos; I Kritselis; G Giannikopoulos; I Koutelidakis; M Pavlaki; E Antoniadou; G Vlachogiannis; V Koulouras; A Prekates; G Dimopoulos; A Koutsoukou; I Pnevmatikos; A Ioakeimidou; A Kotanidou; S E Orfanos; A Armaganidis; C Gogos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  qSOFA, Cue Confusion.

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Manu Shankar-Hari
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Machine learning classification of medication adherence in patients with movement disorders using non-wearable sensors.

Authors:  Conrad S Tucker; Ishan Behoora; Harriet Black Nembhard; Mechelle Lewis; Nicholas W Sterling; Xuemei Huang
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  A Clinical Score for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Authors:  Calvin Kwong; Albee Y Ling; Michael H Crawford; Susan X Zhao; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.869

7.  Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Eamon P Raith; Andrew A Udy; Michael Bailey; Steven McGloughlin; Christopher MacIsaac; Rinaldo Bellomo; David V Pilcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The costs and cost-effectiveness of an integrated sepsis treatment protocol.

Authors:  Daniel Talmor; Dan Greenberg; Michael D Howell; Alan Lisbon; Victor Novack; Nathan Shapiro
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock.

Authors:  Katharine E Henry; David N Hager; Peter J Pronovost; Suchi Saria
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Economic implications of an evidence-based sepsis protocol: can we improve outcomes and lower costs?

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Scott T Micek; William L Jackson; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.