Literature DB >> 2193776

Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of internal jugular vein cannulation. A prospective, randomized trial.

D L Mallory1, W T McGee, T H Shawker, M Brenner, K R Bailey, R G Evans, M M Parker, J C Farmer, J E Parillo.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional versus ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation techniques.
DESIGN: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either conventional or two-dimensional ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation. Patients who could not be cannulated with five or fewer passes by either technique, were crossed over to the other technique.
SETTING: Clinical research unit in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients who required urgent or urgent-elective internal jugular vein cannulation during the study period.
INTERVENTIONS: The two-dimensional ultrasound transducer imaged all cannulation attempts. For patients randomized to ultrasound guidance, the operator viewed two-dimensional ultrasound images, and received verbal guidance from the ultrasound technician. For patients randomized to the conventional arm, two-dimensional ultrasound images were recorded without visual or verbal feedback.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two-dimensional ultrasound was significantly better than conventional guidance in reducing the number of failed site cannulations from 6/17 (35 percent), to 0/12 (0 percent), p less than 0.05. Two-dimensional ultrasound also reduced the mean number of passes required to cannulate the vein from 3.12 to 1.75 (p less than .05), and was also successful in six/six (100) of patients who failed cannulation by conventional means (p less than 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Intensivists can increase successful internal jugular vein cannulation using ultrasound guidance. Two-dimensional ultrasound should be considered for patients difficult to cannulate or those at high risk of cannulation complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2193776     DOI: 10.1378/chest.98.1.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  38 in total

1.  Progress in central venous access?

Authors:  César O Freytes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Norair Airapetian; Julien Maizel; François Langelle; Santhi Samy Modeliar; Dimitrios Karakitsos; Herve Dupont; Michel Slama
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Should ultrasound guidance be used for central venous catheterisation in the emergency department?

Authors:  P Atkinson; A Boyle; S Robinson; G Campbell-Hewson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Inadvertent intrathecal cannulation in an infant, demonstrated by three-dimensional computed tomography: a rare complication of internal jugular vein catheterization.

Authors:  Yoshihito Fujita; Kazuya Sobue; Tomonori Hattori; Akinori Takeuchi; Takako Tsuda; Hirotada Katsuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access.

Authors:  Massimo Lamperti; Andrew R Bodenham; Mauro Pittiruti; Michael Blaivas; John G Augoustides; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Thierry Pirotte; Dimitrios Karakitsos; Jack Ledonne; Stephanie Doniger; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo; David Feller-Kopman; Wolfram Schummer; Roberto Biffi; Eric Desruennes; Lawrence A Melniker; Susan T Verghese
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Echocardiographic guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic percutaneous procedures.

Authors:  Cam Tu Nguyen; Eunice Lee; Huai Luo; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12

7.  Risk factors for acute adverse events during ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Daniel Theodoro; Missy Krauss; Marin Kollef; Bradley Evanoff
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  K/DOQI Guidelines: What Should an Interventionalist Know?

Authors:  Aalpen A Patel; Catherine M Tuite; Scott O Trerotola
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 9.  Ultrasonography as a guide during vascular access procedures and in the diagnosis of complications.

Authors:  A Vezzani; T Manca; A Vercelli; A Braghieri; A Magnacavallo
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10-29

Review 10.  Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.