Literature DB >> 21936698

Methods of evaluating protective clothing relative to heat and cold stress: thermal manikin, biomedical modeling, and human testing.

Catherine O'Brien1, Laurie A Blanchard, Bruce S Cadarette, Thomas L Endrusick, Xiaojiang Xu, Larry G Berglund, Michael N Sawka, Reed W Hoyt.   

Abstract

Personal protective equipment (PPE) refers to clothing and equipment designed to protect individuals from chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive hazards. The materials used to provide this protection may exacerbate thermal strain by limiting heat and water vapor transfer. Any new PPE must therefore be evaluated to ensure that it poses no greater thermal strain than the current standard for the same level of hazard protection. This review describes how such evaluations are typically conducted. Comprehensive evaluation of PPE begins with a biophysical assessment of materials using a guarded hot plate to determine the thermal characteristics (thermal resistance and water vapor permeability). These characteristics are then evaluated on a thermal manikin wearing the PPE, since thermal properties may change once the materials have been constructed into a garment. These data may be used in biomedical models to predict thermal strain under a variety of environmental and work conditions. When the biophysical data indicate that the evaporative resistance (ratio of permeability to insulation) is significantly better than the current standard, the PPE is evaluated through human testing in controlled laboratory conditions appropriate for the conditions under which the PPE would be used if fielded. Data from each phase of PPE evaluation are used in predictive models to determine user guidelines, such as maximal work time, work/rest cycles, and fluid intake requirements. By considering thermal stress early in the development process, health hazards related to temperature extremes can be mitigated while maintaining or improving the effectiveness of the PPE for protection from external hazards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21936698     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.613291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  8 in total

1.  Heat strain imposed by personal protective ensembles: quantitative analysis using a thermoregulation model.

Authors:  Xiaojiang Xu; Julio A Gonzalez; William R Santee; Laurie A Blanchard; Reed W Hoyt
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Building Construction Artisans' Level of Access to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and the Perceived Barriers and Motivating Factors of Adherence to Its Use.

Authors:  Maxwell Kwame Boakye; Selase Kofi Adanu; George Harrison Coffie; Eric Kwadzo Adzivor; John Coker Ayimah
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Biophysical Assessment and Predicted Thermophysiologic Effects of Body Armor.

Authors:  Adam W Potter; Julio A Gonzalez; Anthony J Karis; Xiaojiang Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Occupational Heat Stress and Kidney Health: From Farms to Factories.

Authors:  Fabiana B Nerbass; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; William F Clark; Jessica M Sontrop; Christopher W McIntyre; Louise Moist
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2017-08-31

Review 5.  Resilience and Protection of Health Care and Research Laboratory Workers During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Analysis and Case Study From an Austrian High Security Laboratory.

Authors:  Martina Loibner; Paul Barach; Stella Wolfgruber; Christine Langner; Verena Stangl; Julia Rieger; Esther Föderl-Höbenreich; Melina Hardt; Eva Kicker; Silvia Groiss; Martin Zacharias; Philipp Wurm; Gregor Gorkiewicz; Peter Regitnig; Kurt Zatloukal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Heat stress evaluation of two-layer chemical demilitarization ensembles with a full face negative pressure respirator.

Authors:  Oclla Michele Fletcher; Ryan Guerrina; Candi D Ashley; Thomas E Bernard
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.179

7.  Limiting factors for wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in a health care environment evaluated in a randomised study.

Authors:  Martina Loibner; Sandra Hagauer; Gerold Schwantzer; Andrea Berghold; Kurt Zatloukal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mechanically Robust, Responsive Composite Membrane for a Thermoregulating Textile.

Authors:  Md Anwar Jahid; Jinlian Hu; Suman Thakur
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-02-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.