Literature DB >> 21936294

Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects.

Helmut Leder1, Pablo P L Tinio, Moshe Bar.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that people prefer objects with curved contours over objects with sharp contours. However, those studies used stimuli that were mainly neutral in emotional valence. We tested here the interplay between visual features and general valence as positive or negative. After replicating curvature preferences for neutral objects, we used positive (cake, chocolate) and negative (snake, bomb) stimuli to examine if emotional valence-through response prioritisation-modulates the preference for curved objects. We found that people indeed preferred the curved versions of objects to the sharp versions of the same objects, but only if the objects were neutral or positive in emotional valence. There were no difference in liking for objects with negative emotional valence. This is evidence that the aesthetic response is adaptive, in this case prioritising valence over contour as demanded by the general semantic classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21936294     DOI: 10.1068/p6845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  15 in total

1.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture.

Authors:  Oshin Vartanian; Gorka Navarrete; Anjan Chatterjee; Lars Brorson Fich; Helmut Leder; Cristián Modroño; Marcos Nadal; Nicolai Rostrup; Martin Skov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses.

Authors:  Letizia Palumbo; Nicole Ruta; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Letizia Palumbo; Tamara Nicoleta Gheorghes; Mai Galatsidas
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2015-04-13

4.  Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects.

Authors:  Katherine N Cotter; Paul J Silvia; Marco Bertamini; Letizia Palumbo; Oshin Vartanian
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-04-03

5.  Warm, lively, rough? Assessing agreement on aesthetic effects of artworks.

Authors:  Eva Specker; Michael Forster; Hanna Brinkmann; Jane Boddy; Beatrice Immelmann; Jürgen Goller; Matthew Pelowski; Raphael Rosenberg; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Everything's Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking.

Authors:  Michael Forster; Gernot Gerger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Gerardo Gómez-Puerto; Enric Munar; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  What flowers do we like? The influence of shape and color on the rating of flower beauty.

Authors:  Martin Hůla; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  The Perceived Size and Shape of Objects in Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  Joseph Baldwin; Alistair Burleigh; Robert Pepperell; Nicole Ruta
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-08-17

10.  Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes.

Authors:  Enric Munar; Gerardo Gómez-Puerto; Josep Call; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.