BACKGROUND: Organizational culture is an important driver of organizational performance. However, little is known about the cultures of medical groups, which play an important role in health care. PURPOSE: We sought to characterize the cultures of medical groups and identify factors that influence these cultures. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a qualitative study of the organizational cultures of 8 U.S. multispecialty medical groups, using data collected during site visits and in-depth interviews with clinical and administrative staff (N = 69). Groups were randomly selected from those that participated in the second National Study of Physician Organizations using stratified sampling along three dimensions (i.e., ownership type, use of care management practices, and outcome performance). We analyzed the data to assess the presence of seven culture types-group, hierarchical, rational, developmental, quality oriented, patient centered, and physician centered-using the constant comparative method. FINDINGS: We found that a multiplicity and diversity of cultures exist within and across multispecialty medical groups, with a dominance of patient-centered, physician-centered, rational, or quality-oriented cultures and less emphasis on group, developmental, and hierarchical cultures. Culture types that may seem antithetical, for example, patient-centered and physician-centered cultures, often coexisted within the same group. Across culture types, we found that six factors influenced medical group culture: financial, people, leadership, structural, processes, and environmental. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: As medical groups adapt to changes under health care reform, their success likely depends on their having cultures that facilitate collaboration with other organizations (e.g., hospitals) that possess different cultures and adaptation to changes in payment and regulation. Our study suggests that some groups may not have the developmental and group cultures needed to adapt. Our study identifies six categories of levers they can use to alter their culture as desired.
BACKGROUND: Organizational culture is an important driver of organizational performance. However, little is known about the cultures of medical groups, which play an important role in health care. PURPOSE: We sought to characterize the cultures of medical groups and identify factors that influence these cultures. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a qualitative study of the organizational cultures of 8 U.S. multispecialty medical groups, using data collected during site visits and in-depth interviews with clinical and administrative staff (N = 69). Groups were randomly selected from those that participated in the second National Study of Physician Organizations using stratified sampling along three dimensions (i.e., ownership type, use of care management practices, and outcome performance). We analyzed the data to assess the presence of seven culture types-group, hierarchical, rational, developmental, quality oriented, patient centered, and physician centered-using the constant comparative method. FINDINGS: We found that a multiplicity and diversity of cultures exist within and across multispecialty medical groups, with a dominance of patient-centered, physician-centered, rational, or quality-oriented cultures and less emphasis on group, developmental, and hierarchical cultures. Culture types that may seem antithetical, for example, patient-centered and physician-centered cultures, often coexisted within the same group. Across culture types, we found that six factors influenced medical group culture: financial, people, leadership, structural, processes, and environmental. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: As medical groups adapt to changes under health care reform, their success likely depends on their having cultures that facilitate collaboration with other organizations (e.g., hospitals) that possess different cultures and adaptation to changes in payment and regulation. Our study suggests that some groups may not have the developmental and group cultures needed to adapt. Our study identifies six categories of levers they can use to alter their culture as desired.
Authors: Sean R McClellan; Lawrence P Casalino; Stephen M Shortell; Diane R Rittenhouse Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: W Perry Dickinson; L Miriam Dickinson; Paul A Nutting; Caroline B Emsermann; Brandon Tutt; Benjamin F Crabtree; Lawrence Fisher; Marjie Harbrecht; Allyson Gottsman; David R West Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Debra L Scammon; Jennifer Tabler; Kimberly Brunisholz; Lisa H Gren; Jaewhan Kim; Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Julie Day; Timothy W Farrell; Norman J Waitzman; Michael K Magill Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: L Miriam Dickinson; W Perry Dickinson; Paul A Nutting; Lawrence Fisher; Marjie Harbrecht; Benjamin F Crabtree; Russell E Glasgow; David R West Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer K Walter; Theodore E Schall; Aaron G DeWitt; Jennifer Faerber; Heather Griffis; Meghan Galligan; Victoria Miller; Robert M Arnold; Chris Feudtner Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Ilana Graetz; Jie Huang; Richard Brand; Stephen M Shortell; Thomas G Rundall; Jim Bellows; John Hsu; Marc Jaffe; Mary E Reed Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Wayne A Psek; Rebecca A Stametz; Lisa D Bailey-Davis; Daniel Davis; Jonathan Darer; William A Faucett; Debra L Henninger; Dorothy C Sellers; Gloria Gerrity Journal: EGEMS (Wash DC) Date: 2015-03-10