Literature DB >> 21933274

Journey toward a patient-centered medical home: readiness for change in primary care practices.

Christopher G Wise1, Jeffrey A Alexander, Lee A Green, Genna R Cohen, Christina R Koster.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Information is limited regarding the readiness of primary care practices to make the transformational changes necessary to implement the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model. Using comparative, qualitative data, we provide practical guidelines for assessing and increasing readiness for PCMH implementation.
METHODS: We used a comparative case study design to assess primary care practices' readiness for PCMH implementation in sixteen practices from twelve different physician organizations in Michigan. Two major components of organizational readiness, motivation and capability, were assessed. We interviewed eight practice teams with higher PCMH scores and eight with lower PCMH scores, along with the leaders of the physician organizations of these practices, yielding sixty-six semistructured interviews.
FINDINGS: The respondents from the higher and lower PCMH scoring practices reported different motivations and capabilities for pursuing PCMH. Their motivations pertained to the perceived value of PCMH, financial incentives, understanding of specific PCMH requirements, and overall commitment to change. Capabilities that were discussed included the time demands of implementation, the difficulty of changing patients' behavior, and the challenges of adopting health information technology. Enhancing the implementation of PCMH within practices included taking an incremental approach, using data, building a team and defining roles of its members, and meeting regularly to discuss the implementation. The respondents valued external organizational support, regardless of its source.
CONCLUSIONS: The respondents from the higher and lower PCMH scoring practices commented on similar aspects of readiness-motivation and capability-but offered very different views of them. Our findings suggest the importance of understanding practice perceptions of the motivations for PCMH and the capability to undertake change. While this study identified some initial approaches that physician organizations and practices have used to prepare for practice redesign, we need much more information about their effectiveness.
© 2011 Milbank Memorial Fund. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21933274      PMCID: PMC3214716          DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00634.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  14 in total

1.  Do market-level hospital and physician resources affect small area variation in hospital use?

Authors:  J A Alexander; S Y Lee; J R Griffith; S S Mick; X Lin; J Banaszak-Holl
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.

Authors:  Richard Grol; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice.

Authors:  Deborah Cohen; Reuben R McDaniel; Benjamin F Crabtree; Mary C Ruhe; Sharon M Weyer; Alfred Tallia; William L Miller; Meredith A Goodwin; Paul Nutting; Leif I Solberg; Stephen J Zyzanski; Carlos R Jaén; Valerie Gilchrist; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2004 May-Jun

5.  An exploratory analysis of market-based, physician-organization arrangements.

Authors:  J A Alexander; L R Burns; H S Zuckerman; T Vaughn; R M Andersen; P Torrens; D Hilberman
Journal:  Hosp Health Serv Adm       Date:  1996

6.  Organizations as machines, organizations as conversations: two core metaphors and their consequences.

Authors:  Anthony L Suchman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Halle Amick; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community.

Authors:  James C Martin; Robert F Avant; Marjorie A Bowman; John R Bucholtz; John R Dickinson; Kenneth L Evans; Larry A Green; Douglas E Henley; Warren A Jones; Samuel C Matheny; Janice E Nevin; Sandra L Panther; James C Puffer; Richard G Roberts; Denise V Rodgers; Roger A Sherwood; Kurt C Stange; Cynthia W Weber
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  A house is not a home: keeping patients at the center of practice redesign.

Authors:  Robert A Berenson; Terry Hammons; David N Gans; Stephen Zuckerman; Katie Merrell; William S Underwood; Aimee F Williams
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 10.  The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care.

Authors:  Thomas C Rosenthal
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

View more
  29 in total

1.  Family physician-led, team-based, lifestyle intervention in patients with metabolic syndrome: results of a multicentre feasibility project.

Authors:  Khursheed Jeejeebhoy; Rupinder Dhaliwal; Daren K Heyland; Roger Leung; Andrew G Day; Paula Brauer; Dawna Royall; Angelo Tremblay; David M Mutch; Lew Pliamm; Caroline Rhéaume; Doug Klein
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-03-14

2.  Capsule commentary on Weeks et al., measuring primary care organizational capacity for diabetes care coordination: the diabetes care coordination readiness assessment.

Authors:  Lizheng Shi; Anjum Khurshid
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Opportunities to Improve Informed Consent with AHRQ Training Modules.

Authors:  Sarah J Shoemaker; Cindy Brach; Alrick Edwards; Salome O Chitavi; Rene Thomas; Melanie Wasserman
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2018-05-03

4.  Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  William L Miller; Ellen B Rubinstein; Jenna Howard; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Why do some primary care practices engage in practice improvement efforts whereas others do not?

Authors:  Debora Goetz Goldberg; Stephen S Mick; Anton J Kuzel; Lisa Bo Feng; Linda E Love
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Strategies for achieving whole-practice engagement and buy-in to the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  William K Bleser; Michelle Miller-Day; Dana Naughton; Patricia L Bricker; Peter F Cronholm; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  The relationships of physician practice characteristics to quality of care and costs.

Authors:  John Kralewski; Bryan Dowd; David Knutson; Junliang Tong; Megan Savage
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Implementing the patient-centered medical home in complex adaptive systems: Becoming a relationship-centered patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Signe Peterson Flieger
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2017 Apr/Jun

9.  The Exnovation of Chronic Care Management Processes by Physician Organizations.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Rachel Mosher Henke; Salma Bibi; Patricia P Ramsay; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  The 3 Cs of Content, Context, and Concepts: A Practical Approach to Recording Unstructured Field Observations.

Authors:  Michael D Fetters; Ellen B Rubinstein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.