Literature DB >> 29793885

Opportunities to Improve Informed Consent with AHRQ Training Modules.

Sarah J Shoemaker, Cindy Brach, Alrick Edwards, Salome O Chitavi, Rene Thomas, Melanie Wasserman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a process of communication between clinician and patient that results in the patient's decision about whether to undergo a specific intervention. However, patients often do not understand the risks, benefits, and alternatives, even after signing a consent form.
METHODS: Mixed-methods pilot test of two Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) informed consent training modules implemented in four hospitals. Methods included staff and patient surveys, interviews, site visits, and pre- and posttests of the modules.
RESULTS: A low proportion of clinicians reported using teach-back (40.0%) or high-quality decision aids (55.0%). Patients reported limited use of best practices, including being asked to teach-back (58.4%), having other options described (54.9%), viewing decision aids (37.4%), and finding the form very easy to understand (66.8%). Content of the training modules aligned well with identified deficiencies. Barriers to completing the modules included staff turnover, competing demands, and lack of accountability. Facilitators included committed champions with available time, motivation, and release time for staff to take modules. Knowledge increased for leaders (p <0.05) and staff (p <0.001) who completed the training modules. Hospitals reported the effects of piloting the modules included fostering dialogue and identifying opportunities for improvements, identifying and rectifying policy ambiguity and noncompliance, reinforcing the use of interpreter services, and using modules' strategies and tools to improve informed consent.
CONCLUSION: Many opportunities exist for hospitals to improve their informed consent practices. AHRQ's two training modules, have face validity, addressed demonstrated deficiencies in hospitals' informed consent policies and processes, and stimulated improvement activity in motivated hospitals.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29793885      PMCID: PMC6022821          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  17 in total

1.  Developing an informed consent process with patient understanding in mind.

Authors:  Mary Ann Abrams; Barb Earles
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Halle Amick; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Pediatricians and health literacy: descriptive results from a national survey.

Authors:  Teri Turner; William L Cull; Barbara Bayldon; Perri Klass; Lee M Sanders; Mary Pat Frintner; Mary Ann Abrams; Benard Dreyer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The role of risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery.

Authors:  A Lloyd; P Hayes; P R Bell; A R Naylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures.

Authors:  Paul Kinnersley; Katie Phillips; Katherine Savage; Mark J Kelly; Elinor Farrell; Ben Morgan; Robert Whistance; Vicky Lewis; Mala K Mann; Bethan L Stephens; Jane Blazeby; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian G K Edwards
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-06

Review 7.  Ethical and practical challenges in implementing informed consent in HIV/AIDS clinical trials in developing or resource-limited countries.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mystakidou; Irene Panagiotou; Stelios Katsaragakis; Eleni Tsilika; Efi Parpa
Journal:  SAHARA J       Date:  2009-09

8.  Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures.

Authors:  Mayer Brezis; Sarah Israel; Avital Weinstein-Birenshtock; Pnina Pogoda; Ayelet Sharon; Renana Tauber
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  Reconceptualizing the informed consent process at eight innovative hospitals.

Authors:  Jennifer Matiasek; Matthew K Wynia
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-03

10.  Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; John Piette; Kevin Grumbach; Frances Wang; Clifford Wilson; Carolyn Daher; Krishelle Leong-Grotz; Cesar Castro; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johanna Glaser; Sarah Nouri; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca L Sudore; Dean Schillinger; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Yael Schenker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.583

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.