Literature DB >> 21932826

Following radical pair reactions in solution: a step change in sensitivity using cavity ring-down detection.

Kiminori Maeda1, Simon R T Neil, Kevin B Henbest, Stefan Weber, Erik Schleicher, P J Hore, Stuart R Mackenzie, Christiane R Timmel.   

Abstract

The study of radical pair intermediates in biological systems has been hampered by the low sensitivity of the optical techniques usually employed to investigate these highly reactive species. Understanding the physical principles governing the spin-selective and magneto-sensitive yields and kinetics of their reactions is essential in identifying the mechanism governing bird migration, and might have significance in the discussion of potential health hazards of electromagnetic radiation. Here, we demonstrate the powerful capabilities of optical cavity-enhanced techniques, such as cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) in monitoring radical recombination reactions and associated magnetic field effects (MFEs). These include submicrosecond time-resolution, high sensitivity (baseline noise on the order of 10(-6) absorbance units) and small (μL) sample volumes. Combined, we show that these represent significant advantages over the single-pass flash-photolysis techniques conventionally applied. The studies described here focus on photoinduced radical pair reactions involving the protein lysozyme and one of two possible photosensitizers: anthraquinone-2,6-disulphonate and flavin mononucleotide. CRDS-measured MFEs are observed in pump-probe experiments and discussed in terms of the sensitivity gains and sample-volume minimization afforded by CRDS when compared with flash photolysis methods. Finally, CRDS is applied to an in vitro MFE study of intramolecular electron transfer in the DNA-repair enzyme, Escherichia coli photolyase, a protein closely related to cryptochrome which has been proposed to mediate animal magnetoreception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21932826     DOI: 10.1021/ja206783t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  8 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic field effects in flavoproteins and related systems.

Authors:  Emrys W Evans; Charlotte A Dodson; Kiminori Maeda; Till Biskup; C J Wedge; Christiane R Timmel
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Chemical amplification of magnetic field effects relevant to avian magnetoreception.

Authors:  Daniel R Kattnig; Emrys W Evans; Victoire Déjean; Charlotte A Dodson; Mark I Wallace; Stuart R Mackenzie; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Millitesla magnetic field effects on the photocycle of an animal cryptochrome.

Authors:  Dean M W Sheppard; Jing Li; Kevin B Henbest; Simon R T Neil; Kiminori Maeda; Jonathan Storey; Erik Schleicher; Till Biskup; Ryan Rodriguez; Stefan Weber; P J Hore; Christiane R Timmel; Stuart R Mackenzie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Towards predicting intracellular radiofrequency radiation effects.

Authors:  Claus Nielsen; Ron Hui; Wing-Yee Lui; Ilia A Solov'yov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Engineering an Artificial Flavoprotein Magnetosensor.

Authors:  Chris Bialas; Lauren E Jarocha; Kevin B Henbest; Tilo M Zollitsch; Goutham Kodali; Christiane R Timmel; Stuart R Mackenzie; P Leslie Dutton; Christopher C Moser; P J Hore
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Magnetic sensitivity of cryptochrome 4 from a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Lauren E Jarocha; Tilo Zollitsch; Marcin Konowalczyk; Kevin B Henbest; Sabine Richert; Matthew J Golesworthy; Jessica Schmidt; Victoire Déjean; Daniel J C Sowood; Marco Bassetto; Jiate Luo; Jessica R Walton; Jessica Fleming; Yujing Wei; Tommy L Pitcher; Gabriel Moise; Maike Herrmann; Hang Yin; Haijia Wu; Rabea Bartölke; Stefanie J Käsehagen; Simon Horst; Glen Dautaj; Patrick D F Murton; Angela S Gehrckens; Yogarany Chelliah; Joseph S Takahashi; Karl-Wilhelm Koch; Stefan Weber; Ilia A Solov'yov; Can Xie; Stuart R Mackenzie; Christiane R Timmel; Henrik Mouritsen; P J Hore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Time-resolved magnetic field effects distinguish loose ion pairs from exciplexes.

Authors:  Sabine Richert; Arnulf Rosspeintner; Stephan Landgraf; Günter Grampp; Eric Vauthey; Daniel R Kattnig
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Detection of magnetic field effects by confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Victoire Déjean; Marcin Konowalczyk; Jamie Gravell; Matthew J Golesworthy; Catlin Gunn; Nils Pompe; Olivia Foster Vander Elst; Ke-Jie Tan; Mark Oxborrow; Dirk G A L Aarts; Stuart R Mackenzie; Christiane R Timmel
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 9.825

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.