Lorenza Della Donna1, Chann Lagadec, Frank Pajonk. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 LeConte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1714, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is frequently treated with radiotherapy. While treatment results are in general excellent, some patients relapse and current systemic therapies are not curative, thus, underlining the need for novel targeted therapies. Proteasome inhibitors have been suggested as promising new agents against solid tumors including prostate cancer but initial results from clinical trials are disappointing. METHODS: In this study we tested if prostate cancer cells are heterogeneous with regard to their intrinsic 26S proteasome activity, which could explain the lack of clinical responses to bortezomib. PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cells and an imaging system for proteasome activity were used to identify individual cells with low proteasome activity. Clonogenic survival assays, a sphere-forming assay and an in vivo limiting dilution assay were used to characterize radiation sensitivity, self-renewal capacity, and tumorigenicity of the different subsets of cells. RESULTS: We identified a small population of cells with intrinsically low 26S proteasome activity. Fractionated radiation enriched for these cells and clonogenic survival assays and sphere-forming assays revealed a radioresistant phenotype and increased self-renewal capacity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that low 26S proteasome activity identifies a radioresistant prostate cancer cell population. This population of cells could be responsible for the clinical resistance of advanced prostate cancer to proteasome inhibitors and radiation.
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer is frequently treated with radiotherapy. While treatment results are in general excellent, some patients relapse and current systemic therapies are not curative, thus, underlining the need for novel targeted therapies. Proteasome inhibitors have been suggested as promising new agents against solid tumors including prostate cancer but initial results from clinical trials are disappointing. METHODS: In this study we tested if prostate cancer cells are heterogeneous with regard to their intrinsic 26S proteasome activity, which could explain the lack of clinical responses to bortezomib. PC-3 and DU145prostate cancer cells and an imaging system for proteasome activity were used to identify individual cells with low proteasome activity. Clonogenic survival assays, a sphere-forming assay and an in vivo limiting dilution assay were used to characterize radiation sensitivity, self-renewal capacity, and tumorigenicity of the different subsets of cells. RESULTS: We identified a small population of cells with intrinsically low 26S proteasome activity. Fractionated radiation enriched for these cells and clonogenic survival assays and sphere-forming assays revealed a radioresistant phenotype and increased self-renewal capacity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that low 26S proteasome activity identifies a radioresistant prostate cancer cell population. This population of cells could be responsible for the clinical resistance of advanced prostate cancer to proteasome inhibitors and radiation.
Authors: John D Hainsworth; Anthony A Meluch; David R Spigel; John Barton; Lisa Simons; Christina Meng; Bruce Gould; F Anthony Greco Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Erina Vlashi; Kwanghee Kim; Chann Lagadec; Lorenza Della Donna; John Tyson McDonald; Mansoureh Eghbali; James W Sayre; Encrico Stefani; William McBride; Frank Pajonk Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Noelle K LoConte; James P Thomas; Dona Alberti; Jennifer Heideman; Kimberly Binger; Rebecca Marnocha; Kyle Utecht; Peter Geiger; Jens Eickhoff; George Wilding; Jill Kolesar Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2008-03-06 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Michael J Morris; W Kevin Kelly; Susan Slovin; Charles Ryan; Caitlin Eicher; Glenn Heller; Howard I Scher Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Le Zhang; Justine Bailleul; Taha Yazal; Kevin Dong; David Sung; Amy Dao; Laura Gosa; David Nathanson; Kruttika Bhat; Sara Duhachek-Muggy; Claudia Alli; Milana Bochkur Dratver; Frank Pajonk; Erina Vlashi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Chann Lagadec; Erina Vlashi; Sunita Bhuta; Chi Lai; Paul Mischel; Martin Werner; Michael Henke; Frank Pajonk Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 4.430