| Literature DB >> 21931540 |
Vijayaprakash Suppiah1, Silvana Gaudieri, Nicola J Armstrong, Kate S O'Connor, Thomas Berg, Martin Weltman, Maria Lorena Abate, Ulrich Spengler, Margaret Bassendine, Gregory J Dore, William L Irving, Elizabeth Powell, Margaret Hellard, Stephen Riordan, Gail Matthews, David Sheridan, Jacob Nattermann, Antonina Smedile, Tobias Müller, Emma Hammond, David Dunn, Francesco Negro, Pierre-Yves Bochud, Simon Mallal, Golo Ahlenstiel, Graeme J Stewart, Jacob George, David R Booth.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, drug response genes have not proved as useful in clinical practice as was anticipated at the start of the genomic era. An exception is in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection with pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin (PegIFN/R). Viral clearance is achieved in 40%-50% of patients. Interleukin 28B (IL28B) genotype predicts treatment-induced and spontaneous clearance. To improve the predictive value of this genotype, we studied the combined effect of variants of IL28B with human leukocyte antigen C (HLA-C), and its ligands the killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR), which have previously been implicated in HCV viral control. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21931540 PMCID: PMC3172251 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Med ISSN: 1549-1277 Impact factor: 11.069
Demographic characteristics for chronic hepatitis C patients after therapy, and for those participants with spontaneous virus clearance of HCV included in this study.
| Demographic Factors | Australian Cohort ( | Berlin Cohort ( | Newcastle, UK Cohort ( | Bonn Cohort ( | Trent, UK Cohort ( | Turin Cohort ( | Total Cohort ( | Participants with spontaneous virus clearance ( | |||||||
| SVR ( | NSVR ( | SVR ( | NSVR ( | SVR ( | NSVR ( | SVR ( | NSVR ( | SVR ( | NSVR ( | SVR ( | NSVR ( | SVR ( | NSVR ( | ||
| Age (y) | 40.0 (9.6) | 44.5 (7.1) | 41.0 (10.5) | 46.7 (10.3) | 38.2 (11.8) | 46.0 (12.0) | 44.7 (12.9) | 50.8 (10.9) | 39.8 (9.8) | 45.7 (7.9) | 43.3 (13.1) | 45.1 (10.0) | 40.9 (10.8) | 45.7 | NA |
| Gender (%) | |||||||||||||||
| Females | 52 (40.0) | 42 | 79 (52.7) | 69 (43.1) | 9 (29.0) | 10 (26.3) | 11 (42.3) | 11 (35.5) | 6 (27.3) | 5 (19.2) | 28 (48.3) | 19 (33.9) | 185 (44.4) | 156 | 111 (47.4) |
| Males | 78 (60.0) | 140 (76.9) | 71 (47.3) | 91 (55.9) | 22 (71.0) | 28 (73.7) | 15 (57.7) | 20 (64.5) | 16 (72.7) | 21 (80.8) | 30 (51.7) | 37 (66.1) | 232 (55.6) | 337 (68.4) | 123 (52.6) |
| BMI | 26.9 (5.1) | 27.4 (5.3) | 25.1 (4.5) | 25.9 (3.9) | 23.7 (6.3) | 26.2 (6.6) | 25.4 (4.2) | 27.3 (4.6) | 26.9 (3.5) | 25.0 (2.9) | 24.0 (3.2) | 24.5 (3.3) | 25.5 (4.7) | 26.3 (4.7) | NA |
| Viral load | NS | NS |
|
|
|
|
|
| NS | NS |
|
|
|
| NA |
Unless otherwise specified, mean (SD) are presented.
p<0.05 comparisons between responders (SVR) and NSVR based on the χ2 test.
Comparisons between SVR and NSVR based on the Mann-Whitney test. Viral load was measured differently between cohorts, so the data are presented simply as a statistical comparison within cohorts.
NA, not available; NS, not significant.
Association of IL28B rs8099917 and HLA-C genotypes with viral clearance on therapy and spontaneous clearance.
| Cohort | IL28 | HLA-C | IL28/HLA-C | |||||
| TT | TG | GG | C1C1 | C1C2 | C2C2 | C1*TT | C2C2 G* | |
|
| 247 (62.0) | 134 (33.7) | 17 (4.3) | 151 (38.7) | 185 (47.4) | 54 (13.8) | 200 (51.4) | 13 (3.3) |
|
| 203 (42.7) | 239 (50.3) | 33 (6.9) | 180 (38.9) | 192 (41.5) | 91 (19.7) | 160 (34.9) | 53 (11.5) |
|
|
|
| 0.090 | 1.0 | 0.084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 175 (80.3) | 39 (17.9) | 4 (1.8) | 95 (41.7) | 105 (46.1) | 28 (12.3) | 147 (69.3) | 2 (0.9) |
|
| 450 (51.5) | 373(42.7) | 50(5.7) | 331(38.8) | 377(44.2) | 145(17.0) | 360 (42.5) | 69 (6.5) |
|
|
|
|
| 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Since the HLA-C genotype effect appears to be recessive, and IL28B genotype effect dominant, the genotypes of maximal difference are shown. C1*, C1 carriers; G*, G carriers. Comparisons with p<0.05 are in bold.
Table S2 shows the data for all genotypes.
Three different n represent the three sets of genotyping results being compared in this table, respectively.
Figure 1Association of HLA-C genotype with viral clearance with and without therapy.
OR is plotted against viral clearance for each comparison, plus or minus 95% confidence interval (CI). Vertical height of plotted points is in proportion to log (1/p) where “p” is the probability of observed association being by chance. ORs are shown for each comparison. G*, carrier of G allele.
Figure 2Proportion of each cohort with the HLA-C2C2 and IL28B G* genotype, which predicts treatment failure.
HC, healthy controls; G*, carrier of G allele. Lines connect the significant 2×2 chi-squared comparisons with associated p-values and ORs. HC numbers obtained from Williams et al. [23] and Dunne et al. [22].
Prediction of failure to clear virus on therapy with PegIFN/R.
| Genotype | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive Predictive Value | Negative Predictive Value |
|
| 7 | 96 | 66 | 46 |
|
| 57 | 62 | 64 | 55 |
|
| 20 | 86 | 63 | 47 |
|
| 61 | 39 | 54 | 46 |
|
| 12 | 97 |
|
|
Positive predictive value and negative predictive value for best genotype are in bold.