| Literature DB >> 21931526 |
Appukuttannair R Pradeep1, Anuradha H Jingade, Choba K Singh, Aravind K Awasthi, Vikas Kumar, Guruprasad C Rao, N B Vijaya Prakash.
Abstract
Deforestation and exploitation has led to the fragmentation of habitats and scattering of populations of the economically important eri silkworm, Samia cynthia ricini, in north-east India. Genetic analysis of 15 eri populations, using ISSR markers, showed 98% inter-population, and 23% to 58% intra-population polymorphism. Nei's genetic distance between populations increased significantly with altitude (R(2) = 0.71) and geographic distance (R(2) = 0.78). On the dendrogram, the lower and upper Assam populations were clustered separately, with intermediate grouping of those from Barpathar and Chuchuyimlang, consistent with geographical distribution. The Nei's gene diversity index was 0.350 in total populations and 0.121 in subpopulations. The genetic differentiation estimate (Gst) was 0.276 among scattered populations. Neutrality tests showed deviation of 118 loci from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The number of loci that deviated from neutrality increased with altitude (R(2) = 0.63). Test of linkage disequilibrium showed greater contribution of variance among eri subpopulations to total variance. D('2)IS exceeded D('2)ST, showed significant contribution of random genetic drift to the increase in variance of disequilibrium in subpopulations. In the Lakhimpur population, the peripheral part was separated from the core by a genetic distance of 0.260. Patchy habitats promoted low genetic variability, high linkage disequilibrium and colonization by new subpopulations. Increased gene flow and habitat-area expansion are required to maintain higher genetic variability and conservation of the original S. c. ricini gene pool.Entities:
Keywords: ISSR loci; Samia cynthia ricini; gene diversity; scattered population; subpopulation differentiation
Year: 2011 PMID: 21931526 PMCID: PMC3168194 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572011005000033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Geographical characters of the place of collection of 15 populations of the eri silkworm, Samia cynthia ricini from north-eastern states of India.
| Code | Population | State | District | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude | Physiography |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Barpathar | Assam | Golaghat | 26°20’ N | 93°36’ E | 99 m | Flat terrain |
| E2 | Chuchuyimlang | Nagaland | Makokchung | 26°20’ N | 94°31’ E | 925 m | Hilly terrain |
| E3 | Borduar | Assam | Kamrup | 25°55′ N | 90°38’ E | 61 m | Flat plain |
| E4 | Khanapara | Assam | Kamrup | 26°23′ N | 91°51’ E | 78 m | Flat terrain |
| E5 | Titabar | Assam | Jorhat | 26°60’ N | 94°20’ E | 104 m | Flat terrain |
| E6 | Nongpoh | Meghalaya | Ribhoi | 25°46’ N | 91°46’ E | 525 m | Hilly terrain |
| E7 | Dhanubhanga | Assam | Goalpara | 25°09’ N | 91°10’ E | 35 m | Flat terrain |
| E8 | Mendipathar | Meghalaya | East Garo Hills | 25°52’ N | 90°38’ E | 300 m | Hilly terrain |
| E9 | Imphal | Manipur | Imphal West | 24°38’ N | 93°37’ E | 785 m | Flat terrain |
| E10 | Dhansiripar | Nagaland | Dimapur | 25°54’ N | 93°44’ E | 304 m | Foot Hill |
| E11 | Diphu | Assam | Karbi Anglong | 25°49’ N | 93°43′ E | 609 m | Plateau |
| E12 | Lakhimpur | Assam | Lakhimpur | 27°14’ N | 94°07’ E | 102 m | Flat terrain |
| E13 | Dhemaji | Assam | Dhemaji | 27°49’ N | 94°58’ E | 133 m | Flat terrain |
| E14 | Dhakuakhana | Assam | Lakhimpur | 27°12’ N | 94.28’E | 68 m | Flat terrain |
| E15 | Cachar | Assam | Cachar | 25°32’ N | 92°41’ E | 680 m | Flat terrain |
meters above sea level.
Figure 1Mapping of the phylogeny tree to geographical map of the collection sites of 15 populations (E1 - E15) of Samia cynthia ricini from north-east India. These are as depicted in Table 1. Note the intermediate position of the Barpathar (E1) and Chuchuyimlang (E2) populations in north-south direction between the upper and lower Assam populations, both on the dendrogram and map. Bootstrap values coincide with dendrogram nodes. The states where collections occurred are indicated (Schematic map, not to scale).
ISSR polymorphism and population genetic characteristics of total, commercial and non- commercial scattered populations of the eri silkworm, Samia cynthia ricini.
| Population category | % Polymorphism | Ht | Hs | Gst | Nm | h | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-commercial scattered (E1,E2,E9-E15) | 97.94 | 0.3445 ± 0.1225 | 0.6444 ± 0.0242 | 0.2759 | 1.312 | 0.0879 | 0.1288 |
| Commercial (E3-E8) | 78.35 | 0.2479 ± 0.0345 | 0.1186 ± 0.0158 | 0.5216 | 0.459 | 0.2483 | 0.3766 |
| Total | 100 | 0.3505 ± 0.0195 | 0.1209 ± 0.0078 | 0.6550 | 0.263 | - | - |
E1-E15 populations as given in Table 1;
Gst = genetic differentiation estimate;
Nm = estimate of gene flow from Gst. (Nm = 0.5(1 - Gst)/Gst.);
h = Nei’s (1973) gene diversity index;
I = Shannon’s Information index.
ISSR polymorphism, Nei (1973) gene diversity, average genetic distance and loci selected by Ewans-Watterson test of neutrality of 15 populations of the eri silkworm, Samia cynthia ricini.
| Population | Polymorphism (%) | h | I | na | ne | Average genetic distance within population | Number of loci varied from H-WE with:
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher value | Lower value | |||||||
| Barpathar | 42.78 | 0.1608 | 0.2363 | 1.286 ± 0.390 | 1.286 ± 0.390 | 0.253 | 5 | 0 |
| Chuchuyimlang | 26.80 | 0.0922 | 0.1381 | 1.157 ± 0.302 | 1.157 ± 0.302 | 0.179 | 3 | 0 |
| Borduar | 30.41 | 0.1114 | 0.1645 | 1.197 ± 0.346 | 1.197 ± 0.346 | 0.208 | 1 | 3 |
| Khanapara | 32.47 | 0.1241 | 0.1818 | 1.220 ± 0.360 | 1.220 ± 0.360 | 0.213 | 2 | 0 |
| Titabar | 34.54 | 0.1383 | 0.2001 | 1.252 ± 0.388 | 1.252 ± 0.388 | 0.211 | 5 | 1 |
| Nongpho | 28.35 | 0.1072 | 0.1579 | 1.188 ± 0.338 | 1.188 ± 0.338 | 0.189 | 2 | 6 |
| Dhanubhanga | 33.51 | 0.1258 | 0.1858 | 1.219 ± 0.350 | 1.219 ± 0.350 | 0.225 | 0 | 6 |
| Mendipathar | 28.87 | 0.1048 | 0.1557 | 1.182 ± 0.329 | 1.182 ± 0.329 | 0.229 | 2 | 1 |
| Imphal | 41.24 | 0.1437 | 0.2140 | 1.250 ± 0.362 | 1.250 ± 0.362 | 0.275 | 4 | 4 |
| Dhansirpar | 37.63 | 0.1387 | 0.2042 | 1.245 ± 0.368 | 1.245 ± 0.368 | 0.253 | 4 | 3 |
| Diphu | 32.47 | 0.1116 | 0.1663 | 1.193 ± 0.332 | 1.193 ± 0.332 | 0.246 | 9 | 0 |
| Lakhimpur | 58.25 | 0.1545 | 0.2378 | 1.258 ± 0.344 | 1.258 ± 0.344 | 0.218 | 36 | 4 |
| Dhemaji | 22.68 | 0.0879 | 0.1288 | 1.155 ± 0.314 | 1.155 ± 0.314 | 0.191 | 1 | 2 |
| Dhakuakhana | 29.90 | 0.1155 | 0.1697 | 1.202 ± 0.342 | 1.202 ± 0.342 | 0.291 | 0 | 3 |
| Cachar | 28.87 | 0.0976 | 0.1463 | 1.168 ± 0.317 | 1.168 ± 0.317 | 0.262 | 3 | 8 |
h and
I are as given under Table 2; na = Observed number of alleles; ne = Effective number of alleles (Kimura and Crow, 1964);
Outlier loci with values higher or lower than the lower and upper limits of 95% confidence region of expected F value;
Commercial populations;
Non-commercial populations.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of individuals from the Lakhimpur population of Samia cynthia ricini on an ALSCAL matrix, based on Euclidean distance calculated from independent variables, ISSR loci. Individuals of the population were represented as e12.1 to e12.22. Those in a circle represent the core population. Arrows indicate the separation, at a significant genetic distance, of the peripheral population from the core.