| Literature DB >> 21931508 |
Yan Jiao1, Jifei Zhang, Jian Yan, John Stuart, Griffin Gibson, Lu Lu, Robert Willaims, Yong Jun Wang, Weikuan Gu.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that hepatic vitamin C (VC) levels in VC deficient mice rescued with high doses of VC supplements still do not reach the optimal levels present in wild-type mice. For this, we used a mouse scurvy model (sfx) in which the L-gulonolactone oxidase gene (Gulo) is deleted. Six age- (6 weeks old) and gender- (female) matched wild-type (WT) and sfx mice (rescued by administering 500 mg of VC/L) were used as the control (WT) and treatment (MT) groups (n = 3 for each group), respectively. Total hepatic RNA was used in triplicate microarray assays for each group. EDGE software was used to identify differentially expressed genes and transcriptomic analysis was used to assess the potential genetic regulation of Gulo gene expression. Hepatic VC concentrations in MT mice were significantly lower than in WT mice, even though there were no morphological differences between the two groups. In MT mice, 269 differentially expressed transcripts were detected (≥ twice the difference between MT and WT mice), including 107 up-regulated and 162 down-regulated genes. These differentially expressed genes included stress-related and exclusively/predominantly hepatocyte genes. Transcriptomic analysis identified a major locus on chromosome 18 that regulates Gulo expression. Since three relevant oxidative genes are located within the critical region of this locus we suspect that they are involved in the down-regulation of oxidative activity in sfx mice.Entities:
Keywords: L-gulonolactone oxidase; gene expression; liver; oxidative stress; vitamin C
Year: 2011 PMID: 21931508 PMCID: PMC3168176 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572011005000031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Primers for the different genes studied by real-time PCR.
| Gene | PCR product size (bp) | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fgf21 | 368 | TTCAAATCCTGGGTGTCAAAG | CAGGAAGAGTCAGGACGCATA |
| Jun | 319 | TCCTGCCCGTGTTTGTAAAT | CAGTCTGGACTTGTGTGTTGC |
| Birc5 | 321 | CAGATCTGGCAGCTGTACCTC | TGCAATTTTGTTCTTGGCTCT |
| Mdm2 | 340 | CCAGCATTTTCAGCTTTTTGT | CAAAGCTATCCTTCGCTTCCT |
| Trp53 | 305 | CGTAAACGCTTCGAGATGTTC | GCTGAGCCCTAGCTACAAGGT |
| Gulo | 329 | TTCTTCTTCTGGCTGCTGTTC | GTCTCATAGGCCAGCCAGTAA |
| Cth | 366 | GCACCAACAGGTACTTCAGGA | AACGAAGCCGACTATTGAGGT |
| Cfhl1/Cfhr1 | 358 | TCTGTCGCCTGTTGCTCTTAG | CCTTGATTGCAGACCACTTGT |
| Cyp3a41 | 337 | TTTGATGGTCAAATGCCTCTC | TGCTGGTGATCACATCTATGC |
| Map2k6 | 330 | CTACCTGGTCGACTCTGTTGC | GGATGTTGCATAAGCTCTGGA |
| Gapdh | 533 | GGGTGGAGCCAAACGGGTC | GGAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCA |
Figure 1Body weight (A) and hepatic VC concentration (B) in WT and VC-treated sfx mice. There were no significant differences in body weight between the two groups, but vitamin C concentration was lower in sfx mice. The columns represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group.
Organ weights (in grams) in seven-week-old WT Balb/c mice and VC-treated sfx mice.
| Organs | Balb/c mice | N | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thymus | 0.082 ± 0.011 | 0.081 ± 0.017 | 5 | 0.4578 |
| Spleen | 0.106 ± 0.008 | 0.086 ± 0.005 | 5 | 0.0008 |
| Liver | 1.013 ± 0.116 | 0.989 ± 0.083 | 5 | 0.3581 |
| Heart | 0.133 ± 0.024 | 0.129 ± 0.021 | 5 | 0.4142 |
| Lung | 0.130 ± 0.013 | 0.128 ± 0.005 | 5 | 0.3509 |
| Kidney | 0.274 ± 0.032 | 0.250 ± 0.025 | 5 | 0.1159 |
Values (in grams) are the mean ± SD of the number of mice indicated. P values are for sfx mice compared to WT Balb/c mice.
Figure 2Major clusters of differentially expressed genes in livers of VC-treated sfx mice. Three major clusters with a correlation coefficient (r) ≥ 0.9 and more than 10 transcripts were identified. The probe-to-transcript hybridization signal intensity is color-coded from low (green) to high (red). Genes with the same or similar color have the same or similar expression levels. The relative fold change for a transcript can be estimated from the color scale at the bottom of the figure.
Genes with altered expression in VC-treated sfx mice based on microarray analysis.
| Change | Category | Gene number | p value | Genes affected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Down-regulated | Signaling | 19 | 1.40E-04 | Upk3b, 17rb, Smpd1, Ly6d, Edn1, Gp5, Col1a2, Gdf15, fbln1, Lamb3, Htra3, |
| Extracellular region | 23 | 5.50E-03 | Mesdc2, Il17rb, Ly6d, Edn1, 9430028L06Rik, Gp5, Col1a2, Fbln1, Gdf15, Oscar, Cldn9, Adamts9, Fgf21, Htra3, Inhbe, Lamb3, Chrna2, Gfra3, 1110028A07Rik, Cxcl13, Gpr172b, Bglap-rs1, Slc13a2 | |
| Protein binding | 27 | 5.40E-03 | Gadd45b, Cidec, Il17rb, Edn1, Trim6, Cldn9, Inhbe, Zfp295, Gfra3, Synpo, Meig1, | |
| Development | 17 | 2.40E-03 | Gadd45b, Mesdc2, Gtf2ird1, Edn1, Jun, 2610301F02Rik, Epb4.1l5, Htra3, Lor, Cbfa2t3h, Adra1a, Cxcl13, Birc5, Foxo1, Bglap-rs1 | |
| Membrane | 21 | 8.60E-04 | Upk3b, Il17rb, Ly6d, 9430028L06Rik, Plscr2, Gp5, Svil, Evc2, Mas1, Cpt1b, Cldn9, Gulo, Trpv2, lrfn3, Chrna2, Myom1, Gfra1a, Elovl3, Gpr172b, Slc132 | |
| Up-regulated | Nucleotide binding | 17 | 6.30E-04 | Hspd1, Gna12, 1810048P08Rik, Als2cr2, BC034204, |
| Biosynthesis | 12 | 1.90E-03 | Inhbb, | |
| Membrane | 19 | 1.20E-03 | Gna12, Nsdhl, Slc2a2, Prss8, Aqp8, Mmd2, Ptch1, Dsg2, Prei3, Jam2, Praf2, Tmed3, B3galt3, Ntrk2, Prom1, Ceacam1, Atp6ap2, Dct, | |
| Purine nucleotide binding | 14 | 4.50E-03 | Hspd1, Gna12, 1810048P08Rik, Als2cr2, BC034204, | |
The expression of genes marked in bold was also analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR.
Figure 3Gene expression in WT Balb/c mice and VC-treated sfx mice based on microarray analysis. Down-regulation of genes involved in MAPK signaling (A) and up-regulation of liver-specific genes (B) in VC-treated sfx mice compared to WT mice. In both cases, the fold change is shown in each pair of columns for the given genes.
Figure 4Confirmation of selected gene expression levels by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Nine genes with different expression patterns identified by microarray analysis were selected for validation of the microarray assay. A. PCR products from quantitative RT-PCR. B. Changes in expression levels measured by microarray and RT-PCR. The Y-axis shows the ratio (expressed as fold change) of gene expression between VC-treated sfx mice and normal (WT) mice for each gene and technique used.
Figure 5Transcriptomic mapping of loci that regulate Gulo expression. A. Whole genome mapping revealed loci on chromosomes 2 and 18. B. Critical regions of chromosome 18 that regulate Gulo gene expression.