Literature DB >> 21931454

A quality improvement course review of advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

T Lynn Stevenson1, Lori B Hornsby, Haley M Phillippe, Kristi Kelley, Sharon McDonough.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine strengths of and quality improvements needed in advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) through a systematic course review process.
DESIGN: Following the "developing a curriculum" (DACUM) format, course materials and assessments were reviewed by the curricular subcommittee responsible for experiential education and by key stakeholders. Course sequence overview and data were presented and discussed. A course review worksheet was completed, outlining strengths and areas for improvement. ASSESSMENT: Student feedback was positive. Strengths and areas for improvement were identified. The committee found reviewing the sequence of 8 APPE courses to be challenging.
CONCLUSIONS: Course reviews are a necessary process in curricular quality improvement but can be difficult to accomplish. We found overall feedback about APPEs was positive and student performance was high. Areas identified as needing improvement will be the focus of continuous quality improvement of the APPE sequence.

Keywords:  advanced pharmacy practice experiences; assessment; curriculum; quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21931454      PMCID: PMC3175668          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe756116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  4 in total

1.  Phase 1 of a comprehensive course review process: program innovation.

Authors:  Judith Skelton; Karen P West; Tina Zeff
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Ensuring quality experiential education.

Authors:  Krystal K Haase; Maureen A Smythe; Patricia L Orlando; Beth H Resman-Targoff; Lisa S Smith
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 3.  A curriculum review and mapping process supported by an electronic database system.

Authors:  Mark Britton; Nancy Letassy; Melissa S Medina; Nelson Er
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Reflections on relevance, resistance, and reform in medical education.

Authors:  S P Mennin; S K Krackov
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.893

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  A continuous quality improvement program to focus a college of pharmacy on programmatic advancement.

Authors:  Philip D Hall; Joseph T Dipiro; Randall C Rowen; David McNair
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Essential Elements for Core Required Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

Authors:  Jennifer Danielson; Kathleen Hill Besinque; Cheryl Clarke; Deb Copeland; Denise M Klinker; Lena Maynor; Kate Newman; Nancy Ordonez; See-Won Seo; James Scott; Toyin Tofade; Cathy L Worrall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Pharmacy Student Learning During Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences in Relation to the CAPE 2013 Outcomes.

Authors:  Vincent C Dennis; Dianne W May; Tina J Kanmaz; Shannon L Reidt; Michelle L Serres; Heather D Edwards
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Development of a course review process.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Pamela U Joyner; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Quality Assurance and Improvement Practices of Experiential Education Programs in Schools of Pharmacy.

Authors:  Mitra Assemi; Margarita V DiVall; Kelly Lee; Erin Sy; Teresa O'Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Summative assessment in a doctor of pharmacy program: a critical insight.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-02-17

7.  Application of competency-based education in laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Dongbo Xue; Hong Bo; Weihui Zhang; Song Zhao; Xianzhi Meng; Donghua Zhang
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  A Process and Rubric for a Group to Review the Quality of a Medical Education Course/Clerkship.

Authors:  Kathryn B Moore; Rachel Bonnett; Jorie M Colbert-Getz
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2020-06-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.