BACKGROUND: Variation in healthcare delivery and outcomes in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) may be partly explained by differences in safety culture. OBJECTIVE: To describe NICU care giver assessments of safety culture, explore variability within and between NICUs on safety culture domains, and test for association with care giver characteristics. METHODS: NICU care givers in 12 hospitals were surveyed using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), which has six scales: teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perception of management and working conditions. Scale means, SDs and percent positives (percent agreement) were calculated for each NICU. RESULTS: There was substantial variation in safety culture domains among NICUs. Composite mean score across the six domains ranged from 56.3 to 77.8 on a 100-point scale and NICUs in the top four NICUs were significantly different from the bottom four (p<0.001). Across the six domains, respondent assessments varied widely, but were least positive on perceptions of management (3%-80% positive; mean 33.3%) and stress recognition (18%-61% positive; mean 41.3%). Comparisons of SAQ scale scores between NICUs and a previously published adult ICU cohort generally revealed higher scores for NICUs. Composite scores for physicians were 8.2 (p=0.04) and 9.5 (p=0.02) points higher than for nurses and ancillary personnel. CONCLUSION: There is significant variation and scope for improvement in safety culture among these NICUs. The NICU variation was similar to variation in adult ICUs, but NICU scores were generally higher. Future studies should validate whether safety culture measured with the SAQ correlates with clinical and operational outcomes in NICUs.
BACKGROUND: Variation in healthcare delivery and outcomes in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) may be partly explained by differences in safety culture. OBJECTIVE: To describe NICU care giver assessments of safety culture, explore variability within and between NICUs on safety culture domains, and test for association with care giver characteristics. METHODS: NICU care givers in 12 hospitals were surveyed using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), which has six scales: teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perception of management and working conditions. Scale means, SDs and percent positives (percent agreement) were calculated for each NICU. RESULTS: There was substantial variation in safety culture domains among NICUs. Composite mean score across the six domains ranged from 56.3 to 77.8 on a 100-point scale and NICUs in the top four NICUs were significantly different from the bottom four (p<0.001). Across the six domains, respondent assessments varied widely, but were least positive on perceptions of management (3%-80% positive; mean 33.3%) and stress recognition (18%-61% positive; mean 41.3%). Comparisons of SAQ scale scores between NICUs and a previously published adult ICU cohort generally revealed higher scores for NICUs. Composite scores for physicians were 8.2 (p=0.04) and 9.5 (p=0.02) points higher than for nurses and ancillary personnel. CONCLUSION: There is significant variation and scope for improvement in safety culture among these NICUs. The NICU variation was similar to variation in adult ICUs, but NICU scores were generally higher. Future studies should validate whether safety culture measured with the SAQ correlates with clinical and operational outcomes in NICUs.
Authors: Eric J Thomas; Gwen D Sherwood; Jennipher L Mulhollem; J Bryan Sexton; Robert L Helmreich Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Irene E Olsen; Douglas K Richardson; Christopher H Schmid; Lynne M Ausman; Johanna T Dwyer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Barbara J Stoll; Nellie Hansen; Avroy A Fanaroff; Linda L Wright; Waldemar A Carlo; Richard A Ehrenkranz; James A Lemons; Edward F Donovan; Ann R Stark; Jon E Tyson; William Oh; Charles R Bauer; Sheldon B Korones; Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; David K Stevenson; Lu-Ann Papile; W Kenneth Poole Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: P J Pronovost; B Weast; C G Holzmueller; B J Rosenstein; R P Kidwell; K B Haller; E R Feroli; J B Sexton; H R Rubin Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2003-12
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; John Bryan Sexton; Kathryn C Adair; Heather C Kaplan; Jochen Profit Journal: Clin Perinatol Date: 2017-07-08 Impact factor: 3.430
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Ciaran S Phibbs; J Bryan Sexton; Peiyi Kan; Paul J Sharek; Courtney C Nisbet; Joseph Rigdon; Mickey Trockel; Jochen Profit Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jochen Profit; Paul J Sharek; Peiyi Kan; Joseph Rigdon; Manisha Desai; Courtney C Nisbet; Daniel S Tawfik; Eric J Thomas; Henry C Lee; J Bryan Sexton Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Jochen Profit; Paul J Sharek; Amber B Amspoker; Mark A Kowalkowski; Courtney C Nisbet; Eric J Thomas; Whitney A Chadwick; J Bryan Sexton Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Jochen Profit; John A F Zupancic; Jeffrey B Gould; Kenneth Pietz; Marc A Kowalkowski; David Draper; Sylvia J Hysong; Laura A Petersen Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: J Bryan Sexton; Paul J Sharek; Eric J Thomas; Jeffrey B Gould; Courtney C Nisbet; Amber B Amspoker; Mark A Kowalkowski; René Schwendimann; Jochen Profit Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Jochen Profit; Henry C Lee; Paul J Sharek; Peggy Kan; Courtney C Nisbet; Eric J Thomas; Jason M Etchegaray; Bryan Sexton Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 7.035