Literature DB >> 21929675

Distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: comparison of postoperative outcomes and surrogates of splenic function.

Athanasios Tsiouris1, Chad M Cogan, Vic Velanovich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Published data on splenic preservation during distal pancreatectomy have been inconsistent. We hypothesized that patients undergoing spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) would have fewer infectious and non-infectious complications than those undergoing en bloc distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS), and that their haematological parameters would be consistent with splenic function.
METHODS: Of 97 patients who underwent either SPDP using the Warshaw technique or en bloc DPS, 78 met our study inclusion criteria. Records were reviewed for data on age, gender, resection, indications for resection, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, hospital stay, infectious complications, any other complications, postoperative white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts. Data were analysed using the chi-squared test, the two-sided Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon text, and simple and multiple logistic regression analyses. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing SPDP had a shorter length of stay and shorter operative time, were more likely to be completed laparoscopically, less likely to require re-operation, and had fewer infectious and non-infectious complications. However, these differences were not statistically significant. In multiple logistic regression analyses, patient age and length of hospital stay were both significant predictors of the occurrence of non-infectious complications (P= 0.04 and P= 0.006, respectively). Blood transfusion was a significant predictor of postoperative morbidity (P= 0.013 for infectious complications; P= 0.018 for non-infectious complications). White blood cell count was a statistically significant predictor of infectious (P= 0.02) and non-infectious (P= 0.04) complications, whereas platelet count was not. Patients who underwent DPS had statistically significantly higher WBC and platelet counts immediately postoperatively and at 6 months compared with SPDP patients. Postoperative mortality in both the SPDP and DPS groups was 0%. None of the 30 SPDP patients had evidence of splenic infarction. Pancreatic leaks occurred in 18% of patients in the SPDP group, compared with 8% in the DPS group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy using the Warshaw technique is associated with lower postoperative morbidity than DPS. Lower WBC and platelet counts suggest better splenic function in SPDP patients.
© 2011 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21929675      PMCID: PMC3210976          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00369.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  29 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Juan Santiago Azagra; Claudio Bassi; Georges Delvaux; Joseph Weerts; Jean-Michel Fabre; Jean Boulez; Jacques Baulieux; Jean-Louis Peix; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  The spleen: diagnosis of splenic diseases using radiolabeled tracers.

Authors:  R P Spencer; S M Gupta
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.250

3.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

4.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks.

Authors:  R J Holdsworth; A D Irving; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Splenic function: physiology and splenic hypofunction.

Authors:  R H Sills
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Melotti; Giovanni Butturini; Micaela Piccoli; Luca Casetti; Claudio Bassi; Barbara Mullineris; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation revisited.

Authors:  J Rubén Rodríguez; Michael G Madanat; Brian C Healy; Sarah P Thayer; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy.

Authors:  M C Aldridge; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation: an operation without increased morbidity.

Authors:  Peter Nau; W Scott Melvin; Vimal K Narula; P Mark Bloomston; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy with or without Splenic Preservation.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Guo-Yue Lv; Ying-Chao Wang; Xue-Yan Liu; Guang-Yi Wang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted total pancreatectomy: a pilot western series.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Valerio Genovese; Michael Ginesini; Cesare Gianfaldoni; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-19

3.  Clinical comparison of distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhigang He; Daohai Qian; Jie Hua; Jian Gong; Shengping Lin; Zhenshun Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Values of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative study.

Authors:  Xi-Tai Huang; Jin-Zhao Xie; Jian-Peng Cai; Peng Fang; Chen-Song Huang; Wei Chen; Li-Jian Liang; Xiao-Yu Yin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2022-10-13

5.  Spleen preservation in a caudal pancreatic serous cystadenoma - case report.

Authors:  I Dina; O Ginghina; C Iacobescu; C Vrabie; C Gidea; R Munteanu; R Iosifescu; N Iordache
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

6.  A single-center experience with the laparoscopic Warshaw technique in 122 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Hanbaro Kim; Ki Byung Song; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Sang Hyun Shin; Eun Sung Jun; Seong-Ryong Kim; Bong Jun Kwak; Tae Gu Kim; Kwang-Min Park; Young-Joo Lee; Song Cheol Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Extremely high white blood cell counts on postoperative day 1 do not predict severe complications following distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Gun Hee Jung; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2019-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.