Literature DB >> 21928924

Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God.

Amitai Shenhav1, David G Rand, Joshua D Greene.   

Abstract

Some have argued that belief in God is intuitive, a natural (by-)product of the human mind given its cognitive structure and social context. If this is true, the extent to which one believes in God may be influenced by one's more general tendency to rely on intuition versus reflection. Three studies support this hypothesis, linking intuitive cognitive style to belief in God. Study 1 showed that individual differences in cognitive style predict belief in God. Participants completed the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005), which employs math problems that, although easily solvable, have intuitively compelling incorrect answers. Participants who gave more intuitive answers on the CRT reported stronger belief in God. This effect was not mediated by education level, income, political orientation, or other demographic variables. Study 2 showed that the correlation between CRT scores and belief in God also holds when cognitive ability (IQ) and aspects of personality were controlled. Moreover, both studies demonstrated that intuitive CRT responses predicted the degree to which individuals reported having strengthened their belief in God since childhood, but not their familial religiosity during childhood, suggesting a causal relationship between cognitive style and change in belief over time. Study 3 revealed such a causal relationship over the short term: Experimentally inducing a mindset that favors intuition over reflection increases self-reported belief in God. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928924     DOI: 10.1037/a0025391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  37 in total

1.  Betting on Illusory Patterns: Probability Matching in Habitual Gamblers.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Andreas Wilke; Benjamin Scheibehenne; Paige McCanney; H Clark Barrett
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-03

2.  God, Germs, and Evolution: Belief in Unobservable Religious and Scientific Entities in the U.S. and China.

Authors:  Jennifer M Clegg; Yixin K Cui; Paul L Harris; Kathleen H Corriveau
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2019-03

3.  What Makes You So Sure? Dogmatism, Fundamentalism, Analytic Thinking, Perspective Taking and Moral Concern in the Religious and Nonreligious.

Authors:  Jared Parker Friedman; Anthony Ian Jack
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-02

4.  Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; James Allan Cheyne; Derek J Koehler; Jonathan A Fugelsang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

5.  Turking Overtime: How Participant Characteristics and Behavior Vary Over Time and Day on Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Antonio A Arechar; Gordon Kraft-Todd; David G Rand
Journal:  J Econ Sci Assoc       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 6.  Gamble with Your Head and Not Your Heart: A Conceptual Model for How Thinking-Style Promotes Irrational Gambling Beliefs.

Authors:  Tess Armstrong; Matthew Rockloff; Matthew Browne
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2020-03

7.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed.

Authors:  David G Rand; Joshua D Greene; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Fast and Slow Empathic Perceptions in Couples' Daily Lives Use Different Cues.

Authors:  Haran Sened; Eran Bar-Kalifa; Rony Pshedetzky-Shochat; Marci Gleason; Eshkol Rafaeli
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2020-04-17

9.  The illusion of argument justification.

Authors:  Matthew Fisher; Frank C Keil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-03-18

10.  Paranormal psychic believers and skeptics: a large-scale test of the cognitive differences hypothesis.

Authors:  Stephen J Gray; David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.