Literature DB >> 36042967

Fast and Slow Empathic Perceptions in Couples' Daily Lives Use Different Cues.

Haran Sened1, Eran Bar-Kalifa2, Rony Pshedetzky-Shochat1, Marci Gleason3, Eshkol Rafaeli1,4,5.   

Abstract

Empathic accuracy, the ability to infer another person's emotions, thoughts, and other fleeting mental states, has been linked to assumed similarity (wherein the perceiver assumes that another person's mental states are similar to their own) and direct accuracy (wherein the perceiver uses various external cues to reach their judgment). Previous research has linked this component model, as well as dual process models, to neuroscientific models of empathy, but has not linked these components with dual process accounts directly. Thus, we examined whether assumed similarity involves rapid (type-1) processing while direct accuracy involves slower (type-2) inferences. In three dyadic daily diary samples (total N = 262 romantic couples), we examined associations between both components and response times. As expected, direct accuracy, but not assumed similarity, was associated with slower response times. Our findings suggest links between previously disparate lines of research and identify situations which may tip the balance between the empathic components. © The Society for Affective Science 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Close relationships; Dual process; Emotion perception; Empathy; Interpersonal accuracy

Year:  2020        PMID: 36042967      PMCID: PMC9382916          DOI: 10.1007/s42761-020-00006-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Affect Sci        ISSN: 2662-2041


  26 in total

Review 1.  The neural bases for empathy.

Authors:  Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?

Authors:  James A Cranford; Patrick E Shrout; Masumi Iida; Eshkol Rafaeli; Tiffany Yip; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07

Review 4.  Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework.

Authors:  Anett Gyurak; James J Gross; Amit Etkin
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-04

Review 5.  Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Haran Sened; Michal Lavidor; Gal Lazarus; Eran Bar-Kalifa; Eshkol Rafaeli; William Ickes
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10

Review 6.  Oxytocin, brain physiology, and functional connectivity: a review of intranasal oxytocin fMRI studies.

Authors:  Richard A I Bethlehem; Jack van Honk; Bonnie Auyeung; Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.905

7.  Couples' Perceptions of Each Other's Daily Affect: Empathic Accuracy, Assumed Similarity, and Indirect Accuracy.

Authors:  Chrystyna D Kouros; Lauren M Papp
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2018-02-23

8.  A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen's f(2), a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED.

Authors:  Arielle S Selya; Jennifer S Rose; Lisa C Dierker; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-17

Review 9.  Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking.

Authors:  Jelte M Wicherts; Coosje L S Veldkamp; Hilde E M Augusteijn; Marjan Bakker; Robbie C M van Aert; Marcel A L M van Assen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-25

10.  Toward an integrative account of social cognition: marrying theory of mind and interactionism to study the interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 processes.

Authors:  Vivian Bohl; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.