Literature DB >> 21928367

'Everything contradicts in your mind': a qualitative study of experiences of forensic mental health staff in two contrasting services.

Arabella Kurtz1, Nikki Jeffcote.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the theoretical literature, there is growing recognition of the psychological impact on staff of working in challenging healthcare settings. In forensic mental health (FMH) services, powerful transference and counter-transference reactions in staff-patient relationships may emerge and may even play a role in contributing to incidents of malpractice, but there is little empirical research here. AIM: The exploration of the experiences of FMH staff in two contrasting services.
METHOD: Thirteen in-depth interviews were carried out with staff from a range of clinical disciplines in a mainstream National Health Service (NHS) medium secure unit (MSU), and 12 interviews were undertaken with such staff from a Personality Disorder Unit (PDU) in an MSU. All interview data were analysed independently using the grounded theory method. To synthesise the two separate analyses, a thematic analysis of both data sets was carried out, in which 'thematic units' were defined as significant points of comparison between the analyses of the two sets of interviews.
RESULTS: The combined analysis yielded six main themes under two main headings. Themes under the first heading Experience of the Clinical Task were: 'difficulty in achieving task integration'; 'motivation to build relationships, work through difficulty and bring about change'; and 'minimal sense of risk and anxiety at the centre'. Themes under the second heading Experience of the Organisation were: 'a distant and difficult relationship with outside'; 'preoccupation with staff relationships'; and 'feeling unsafe'. The overarching concept of the combined analysis was encapsulated in the quotation: 'Everything contradicts in your mind'. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Clinical and organisational aspects of work seemed separate in the minds of staff, with the latter reported to be more stressful; staff support came in the form of close relationships with colleagues, who saw themselves as isolated in the context of the wider environment. Promotion of the well-being and effectiveness of FMH staff should therefore take account of clinical, organisational and societal aspects of their situation. 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928367     DOI: 10.1002/cbm.796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health        ISSN: 0957-9664


  4 in total

1.  Clinicians' perspectives of forensic rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter Robertson; Mary Barnao; Tony Ward; Astrid Birgden; Sharon Casey; Belinda Guardagno
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 2.  The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mark C Freestone; Kim Wilson; Rose Jones; Chris Mikton; Sophia Milsom; Ketan Sonigra; Celia Taylor; Colin Campbell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Moral Dilemmas in Contact-Based Care: The Relevance of Moral Case Deliberation for Forensic Psychiatry.

Authors:  Sylvia Gerritsen; Guy A M Widdershoven; Bernard J Bossenbroek; Yolande Voskes
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Quality improvement in forensic mental health: the East London forensic violence reduction collaborative.

Authors:  Owen P O'Sullivan; Nynn Hui Chang; Day Njovana; Philip Baker; Amar Shah
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.